United States v. Weed (389 F.3d 1060)

United States of America v. Jason M. Weed, appeal decision  (2004)  by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Syllabus

Opinion of the Court→

related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, November 16, 2004, No. 03-5100, United States of America v. Jason M. Weed, APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (D.C. NO. CR-02-10-K), November 16, 2004

389 F.3d 1060 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JASON M. WEED, Defendant-Appellant No. 03-5100 United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. November 16, 2004

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

(D.C. NO. CR-02-10-K)

Barry L. Derryberry, Federal Public Defender (Julia L. O'Connell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, with him on the briefs), Office of the Federal Public Defender, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Defendant-Appellant.

Kevin C. Danielson, Assistant United States Attorney (David E. O'Meilia, United States Attorney, with him on the brief), Office of the United States Attorney, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before O'BRIEN, HOLLOWAY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

---

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

See also

• Landmark Education litigation

Related public court documents

• Neff vs. Landmark Education (1997)
• Been v. Jason M. Weed and Landmark Education Corporation (2004), Third Ammended Petition
• Been v. Jason M. Weed and Landmark Education Corporation (2004), Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Landmark Motion Dismiss Plaintiff
• Been v. Jason M. Weed and Landmark Education Corporation (2004), Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Landmark Motion Interlocutory
• Been v. Jason M. Weed and Landmark Education Corporation (2006), Publication Notice