United States v. Miller (307 U.S. 174)

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
the Supreme Court of the United States
Syllabus
891897United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) — Syllabus1939the Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States

307 U.S. 174

UNITED STATES  v.  MILLER ET AL.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas

No. 696.  Argued: Mar. 30, 1939 --- Decided: May 15, 1939

The National Firearms Act, as applied to one indicted for transporting in interstate commerce a 12-gauge shotgun with a barrel less than 18 inches long, without having registered it and without having in his possession a stamp-affixed written order for it, as required by the Act, held:

1. Not unconstitutional as an invasion of the reserved powers of the States. Citing Sonzinsky v. United States, 300 U.S. 506, and Narcotic Act cases. P. 177.

2. Not violative of the Second Amendment of the Federal Constitution. P. 178.

The Court can not take judicial notice that a shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long has today any reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia; and therefore can not say that the Second Amendment guarantees to the citizen the right to keep and bear such a weapon.

26 F. Supp. 1002, reversed.

Appeal under the Criminal Appeals Act from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to an indictment for violation of the National Firearms Act.

Mr. Gordon Dean argued the cause, and Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General McMahon, and Messrs. William W. Barron, Fred E. Strine, George F. Kneip, W. Marvin Smith, and Clinton R. Barry were on a brief, for the United States.

No appearance for appellees.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse