User talk:J.Steinbock

Discussion Page Policy
Click here to post a new message.
Generally, I will respond to your questions or comments on your talk page. However, to prevent fragmented discussions, I will contribute to longer conversations on my talk page.
When initiating a new topic, please use a relevant heading. In addition, please sign your messages with your user name. If your message fails to meet these requirements, I will delete the message and store them within my Deleted Message Archives.
Vandalism as well as personal attacks will not be tolerated. They will be promptly revomed from my discussion page. Please do not corrupt the integrity of Wikisource and the other Wikimedia projects by blatantly promoting indecorum.
Customarily, I will chronologically archive the messages in to separate categories . This procedure is performed after ten messages have been posted. In certain cases, I may create archives for a specific topic. Please do not edit any messages in the Discussion Archives.
You may add a new table on my Disussion Page if the presnent table violates or does not meet your needs. However, please do not tamper with the main table.
By proceeding to leave a message on this Disscussion Page, you are agreeing to the stated terms and requirements.

Public Note

I am offline

Public Announcement

I am currently unable to contribute to Wikisource. I working within a scientific endeavor called Ethanol Production Through Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Bacterial Fermentation. I will explain this on my user page once the process is completed.

Messages will appear below Cleanup I noticed a couple of pages you added "cleanup" tags to: Wikisource:About and Talmud. It is not clear to me what about these pages requires cleanup - maybe it would be better if you added a comment about what you think needs "cleaning" :-) Dovi 07:52, 16 December 2005 (UTC) Wikisource:Help Hi. Yeah, if you want to help renovate that page, it looks like it could use some work. And please, if you want to make it more comprehensive, go right ahead. If you have any questions, I'm always available (especially now that final exams are over), and other members here would be glad to help, too, I'm sure.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 16:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC) "Expand" template Hi. When you have an individual text that is only partially typed, it makes sense to leave a message like this for users so that they can go ahead and add more of the test. We have a template like that in he: which is mostly use when texts are "in progress" (so that several people won't bother typing the same thing). It has a picture of a typewriter... :-) For a something like the Talmud chart-index this makes no sense. This is a massive text with sub-books and sub-sub-books. The red versus blue links are indication enough of what texts have been done and what not. The "expand" message unfortunately does nothing but make the page less aesthetic. As for the Wikisource:About page, that is meant to be a brief description (like on most websites). Not that someone can't expand it appropriately if they want to - of course they can - but it's not like something is "missing there. Hope this helps with confusion :-). Dovi 18:10, 17 December 2005 (UTC) EB1911 classification Hi, A discussion has started on Scriptorium [1]about adopting the same classsification for the WS version as was used on the original printed version. This has distinct advantages. Your comments are welcomed. Kind regards. Apwoolrich 18:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)