User talk:Stevertigo~enwikisource
Hello Stevertigo. Please note that I have proposed that Iraq Study Group Report be deleted as a copyright violation; I invite you to participate in the discussion taking place on Possible copyright violations. The text will be deleted in a week if there is no dispute that this work is copyrighted. Thank you for your interest in our project. --Benn Newman (AMDG) 19:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikisource ISG Report section deletion User:Pmsyyz, on wikisource, has deleted the title/Preface page Iraq Study Group Report/Preface. It appears to have been listed for speedy deletion and no one caught it in time to specifically protest. Our remarks on Wikisource:Possible copyright violations#Iraq Study Group Report appear to have gone unheard. The third remark seems to have summed up one of the major reasons for allowing the entire text to remain on wikisource. After all, everything that was in the PDF was part of what the U.S. Institute of Peace released for full reproduction.
I took a look at Pmsyyz to find out what I could. I can't tell if he is an admin, although if he is it would seem logical that it would be listed. I don't know. I suspect that someone needs to figure out exactly what type of public domain copyright this text falls within, and then list it at the bottom of the needed pages.
Have you considered linking your Noam Chomsky piece to his wikipedia page? All that it has now is a search link.Jmcneill2 12:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
He did it again, reverting a correction that was made only 4 hours earlier.Jmcneill2 21:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Can you take a look at Iraq Study Group Report to see if the text content of Executive Summary can be linked to the title in the Contents area, Executive Summary. I seem to remember that it worked that way at one time and you were the one that made it happen. Am I right?Jmcneill2 02:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
I found a second PDF version of the ISG report that PMsyyz seems to be working from. I have written a note to all of us and posted it on the discussion page [1].Jmcneill2 06:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed[edit]
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Stevertigo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Stevertigo~enwikisource that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed[edit]
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
06:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)