Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/Zhaladshar

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
Warning Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive collecting requests for restricted access by Zhaladshar. See current discussion or the archives index.

Zhaladshar[edit]

2005-04 admin[edit]

The text in the box below was copied from the multilingual Wikisource nomination archives.

I do a lot of clean-up where it would be easier for me just to delete orphaned redirect pages then use them to clutter up our proposed deletions page. And of course, there's always the wonderful vandalism we have to revert. Zhaladshar 14:11, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Yes. Yann 15:38, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Pour. Marc 09:38, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Christian S 11:44, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. ThomasV 12:23, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Appointed. oldwikisource:User:Anthere 15:44, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

2006-03 checkuser (failed)[edit]

The text in the box below was copied from the merged discussion when it was split into the individual users.

Pathoschild and I spoke recently about problems here on Wikisource with cross-project vandals and sockpuppets, and the potential for Checkuser to identify such accounts. Pathoschild expressed the desire to become a local checkuser for Wikisource, but was unsure if there was another individual here who had the technical skills and the desire to become a checkuser. (Foundation policy requires there be two checkusers on a project; if two are not approved, there can be no local checkuser.) As a en.wikipedia checkuser, I have the requisite technical abilities, and I am always willing to serve where needed; I indicated to Pathoschild that I would be willing to serve as the second local checkuser in order for Wikisource to be able to have local checkusers. As such, I am nominating Pathoschild and myself to serve as local checkusers, if the community believes there is need for such. (If there is a more active local user who has the technical knowledge and desire to serve, I will be more than happy to withdraw from consideration.)

More information on checkuser can be found at m:Checkuser. I have made separate voting sections for Pathoschild & I in case others wish to submit themselves for consideration (we can have as many as we like, but must have at least two for the status to be granted at all). Essjay TalkContact 12:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Current checkuser

Just for information I believe Yann already has a checkuser facility.
As a steward, yes, as a local checkuser, no; stewards have the ability to temporarily grant themselves checkuser to perform checks on wikis without local checkusers, but it is more difficult to find a steward to perform a checkuser than it is to have a local checkuser do it. If he's willing to stand as a local checkuser, I'll withdraw. Essjay TalkContact 13:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
I noted recently that User:Ambi has checkuser status on WP. She has been an admin here from the early days, but have not been very active in recent months. Apwoolrich 18:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Withdrawing self-nom

With the entry of Zhaladshar, I withdraw as I said I would. If a technical advisor is needed, please feel free to ask. Specifically, using the interface is not difficult, but interpreting the results (separating shared IPs from actual sockpuppets, etc.) can be very, very difficult, especially if you are not familiar with the workings of IP addresses; for example, IP ranges, dynamic IPs, proxies used for routing (many countries, especially Middle Eastern ones, route all thier traffic through routing proxies for "control purposes", and blocking one of these shared proxies blocks the whole country (I accidentally blocked all of Saudi Arabia once...)) etc. can result in false positives. Best of luck to the candidates Essjay TalkContact 01:50, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Denied

For historical reference on why Wikisource's request was denied, see the Wikisource news stories "Voting begins on two for CheckUser access" (30 March 2006) and "Local CheckUser status in doubt" (19 April 2006). —{admin} Pathoschild 21:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Since there need to be two local checkusers, and since I'm very active in the project and can be reached very easily via e-mail (odds are, if you e-mail me, I'll know in about one minute) almost most of the day, I'm requesting candidacy for the second checkuser slot.

Support

  1. Yes AllanHainey 15:24, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. Support --BirgitteSB 17:05, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Support, wholeheartedly. Apwoolrich 18:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  4. Support --Politicaljunkie 22:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  5. Support. As the local bureaucrat, long-standing administrator, and editor in spotless standing, Zhaladshar has more than demonstrated his responsibility and commitment to the project. —{admin} Pathoschild 06:13, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  6. Yann 17:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  7. Support - Danny 02:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  8. Absolutely. Dovi 03:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  9. Support - illy 14:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
  10. Support--Jusjih 15:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
  11. Support - See above --Robert Horning 18:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
  12. Support --Kernigh 21:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  13. Support - Antireconciler 21:58, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  14. Support - Bookofjude 00:27, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

2006-09 confirmation[edit]

  • Support continued adminship and bureaucratishness. —{admin} Pathoschild 01:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support continued power. --BirgitteSB 01:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support continued adminship and Zhaladsharishness.--Shanel 04:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support continued adminship and bureaucratship. - Politicaljunkie 22:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support continued adminship & bureaus. - AllanHainey 11:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support continued adminship & b ThomasV 06:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Confirmed. —{admin} Pathoschild 22:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

2007-10 confirmation[edit]

Confirmed. ++Lar: t/c 02:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

2008-11 confirmation[edit]

  • I favour confirmation; although he's currently busy with grad school, he's an active and productive user. —Pathoschild 00:09:07, 05 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm, active and editing. Jeepday (talk) 00:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm, John Vandenberg (chat) 01:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm Hesperian 02:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  • ConfirmJack Merridew 10:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm. --Zyephyrus (talk) 12:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Durova (talk) 23:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm, though the fact that he has a life outside of Wikisource is very concerning. ;) EVula // talk // 06:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Blah blah, I think I am starting to repeat myself. We cannot do without Zhaladshar. Jude (talk) 02:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm--Shanel (talk) 02:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm, per EVula (talkcontribs). Cirt (talk) 01:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Synergy 05:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm FloNight (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm.--GrafZahl (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm--Jusjih (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Confirm--Suicidalhamster (talk) 15:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

2009-12 confirmation[edit]

Administrator since 30 April 2005 and Bureaucrat since 12 September 2006 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions, logs, crosswiki). Zhaladshar will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger an election with decision by simple majority.

Confirmed billinghurst (talk) 06:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

2011-01 confirmation[edit]

The following discussion is closed: confirmed
Administrator since 30 April 2005 and bureaucrat since 12 September 2006 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions, logs, crosswiki). Zhaladshar will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger an election with decision by simple majority.

2012-02 confirmation[edit]

admin since April 2005, bureaucrat since September 2006 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions, logs, crosswiki). Zhaladshar will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger an election with decision by simple majority.

2013-03 confirmation[edit]

admin since April 2005, bureaucrat since September 2006 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions, logs, crosswiki). Zhaladshar will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger an election with decision by simple majority.