Zschernig v. Miller

Zschernig v. Miller
the Supreme Court of the United States

Syllabus

→

related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.

Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429 (1968), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated an Oregon statute for unconstitutionally intruding into the federal realm of foreign affairs even though the statute did not conflict with any federal treaty or statute. Warning: template has been deprecated.

931903Zschernig v. Miller — Syllabusthe Supreme Court of the United States

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

Concurring Opinions: Stewart; Harlan

Dissenting Opinion: White

Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

389 U.S. 429

Zschernig v. Miller

Argued: Nov. 7, 1967. --- Decided: Jan 15, 1968

Peter A. Schwabe, Sr., Portland, Or., for appellants; Peter A. Schwabe, Jr., on the brief.

Wayne M. Thompson, Salem, Or., for appellees; Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen., on the brief.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Sol. Gen. Thurgood Marshall, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen. Carl Eardley, John S. Martin, Jr., and Alan S. Rosenthal, Washington, D.C., for the United States and by Edward Mosk, Hollywood, Cal., for Slaff, Mosk & Rudman.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

Zschernig v. Miller

Notes[edit]

Navigation menu

Search