MediaWiki API result

{
    "batchcomplete": "",
    "warnings": {
        "main": {
            "*": "Subscribe to the mediawiki-api-announce mailing list at <https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/mediawiki-api-announce.lists.wikimedia.org/> for notice of API deprecations and breaking changes. Use [[Special:ApiFeatureUsage]] to see usage of deprecated features by your application."
        },
        "info": {
            "*": "The value \"preload\" to parameter \"inprop\" has been deprecated."
        }
    },
    "query": {
        "pages": {
            "-1": {
                "ns": 104,
                "title": "Page:The Victoria History of the County of Lincoln Volume 2.pdf/308",
                "missing": "",
                "contentmodel": "proofread-page",
                "pagelanguage": "en",
                "pagelanguagehtmlcode": "en",
                "pagelanguagedir": "ltr",
                "preload": "<noinclude><pagequality level=\"1\" user=\"\" /></noinclude>A HISTORY OF LINCOLNSHIRE\nIn the second half of the fifteenth century and the early years of that\nwhich followed we may briefly note the struggle between a secular landlord,\n\nDe\n\nLaunde, and his near neighbours the Hospitallers of Temple\nBruer, as an illustration of a certain friction which in some instances may\nhave led the local gentry to acquiesce with greater readiness than might\nhave been anticipated in the spoliation of the religious houses,^ though their\ndissolution was certainly one factor in the causation of the Lincolnshire\nrising which heralded the Pilgrimage of Grace.\nThis rebellion in Lincolnshire and beyond the Trent was the outcome of\ndiscontent both political and religious.\nThe turbulent nobility of the north\nresented the influence of the men of low birth, whom they complained were\ndominant in the royal councils. Another grievance was found in the recent\nStatute of Uses, designed to deal with the intricacies of tenure in the interest\nof the crown.\nThe landed gentry declared with some reason that they could\nno longer raise ready money by charges on their estates nor provide for any\nbut their eldest sons. ' Younger brothers would none of that in no wise,' wrote\nthe earl of Oxford to Cromwell.\nHow bitterly the action of the statute was\nresented may be ascertained from the speech of Mr. Dymoke, the sheriff^\n\nRobert\n\nla\n\nof Lincoln, to the insurgents at Horncastle, or the statements contained in\n\nThis and other motives furnished provocation to\nThe commons had other and material grievances.\nGrazing had become immensely profitable. Corn-land was turned into\npasture, and yeomen and copyholders who had once held up their heads\nbefore their fellows were evicted * from their holdings or ousted from enjTDyment of the common lands, whilst the unquiet state of the public mind was\nfurther disturbed by the interrogatories of the subsidy commissioners and\nstrangely distorted rumours as to the imposition of parish registers.'\nBut\nthe grievances of gentry and commons, however real to either class of\nsufferers, were no material for common or united action, and would hardly\nhave brought about a serious rising but for the king's proceedings in the\nthe examination of Aske.\nthe cadets of the gentry.\n\nThe Lincolnshire rebellion of 1536 was very largely\nmatter of religion.\nan immediate outcome of the suspicions engendered by the suppression of\nthe lesser monastic houses, and by the raising to high place of avowed\nadherents of the ' New Learning.' A widespread expectation was undoubtedly\npresent that the spoliation of the religious merely formed a prelude to the\nStrenuously denied by the king and his\npillage of parish churches.\nministers, this fear was justified not many years after by the proceedings of\nthe Edwardian reformers.\nThe first outbreak in Lincolnshire was at Louth, not far from Legbourne\nNunnery, which in late September, 1536, was suppressed by the royal visitors.\nThere had been premonitory symptoms of unrest, for on St. Matthew's Day\na tall serving-man,' probably one of Cromwell's retainers from Legbourne,,\n'\n\nInst. Proc. at Line. (1848), 67 sqq.\nInequitable enclosures would seem, however, to have had little to do with the purely Lincolnshire\nThe Rev. W. O. Massingberd, who has made a special study of the social and economic position of\nrising.\nthe small holders, kindly points out that the 'Domesday of Enclosures' (15 17) reveals no injustice in Lin'\n\nArch.\n\n'\n\nThe religious factor was certainly dominant in the rising, and apart from the suppression of the\ncolnshire.\nmonasteries and the anxiety for the parish churches the facts brought out in the examination of Kendall, the\nvicar of Louth, and other insurgents show that there was widespread 'grudging' against the royal\nand discipline.\nDep. of Henry Thornbek. L. and P. Hen. VIII,\n\ninterference with doctrine\n'\n\n270\n\nxi,\n\n324.\n\n<noinclude>\n</noinclude>"
            }
        }
    }
}