Broussard v. Baker/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Broussard v. Baker
Opinion of the Court
857245Broussard v. Baker — Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

241 U.S. 639

Broussard  v.  Baker


Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U.S. 596, 600, 57 L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609; Manhattan L. Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U.S. 123, 137, 58 L. ed. 1245, 1254, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U.S. 380, 382, 59 L. ed. 279, 281, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 133; (2) Fischer v. St. Louis, 194 U.S. 361, 48 L. ed. 1018, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 673; Davis v. Massachusetts, 167 U.S. 43, 42 L. ed. 71, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 731; (3) Iowa C. R. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U.S. 389, 40 L. ed. 467, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 344; Washington v. Miller, 235 U.S. 422, 429, 59 L. ed. 295, 299, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 119; Roby v. South Park Comrs. 238 U.S. 610, 59 L. ed. 1488, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 791.

Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse