Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co.

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co.  (2003) 
by the Supreme Court of New Jersey
Syllabus

Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co., 176 N.J. 397, 823 A.2d 789 (2003), is a New Jersey Supreme Court case involving the exclusivity of the Workers' Compensation Act as a remedy for injured workers.


Court Documents
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinions
Verniero
Zazzali


SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

176 N.J. 397, 823 A.2d 789

Annabelle CRIPPEN, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and General Administratrix of the Estate of Harold Crippen, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,  v.  CENTRAL JERSEY CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and Gallo Industries, Inc., XYZ Company, 1-100 (a fictitious name) and/or John Doe (a fictitious name), Defendants.

 Argued: March 3, 2003 --- Decided: May 22, 2003

Verniero, J., concurred and filed separate opinion in which LaVecchia, J., joined.

Zazzali J., concurred and filed separate opinion.

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).


Nuvola apps important.svg
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.