Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/65. Verbs Third Guttural

by Wilhelm Gesenius, edited and enlarged by Emil Kautzsch

Layout 2

§65. Verbs Third Guttural, e.g. שָׁלַח to send.^[1]

a 1. According to § 22 d, when the last syllable has a vowel incompatible with the guttural (i.e. not an a-sound), two possibilities present themselves, viz. either the regular vowel remains, and the guttural then takes furtive Pathaḥ, or Pathaḥ (in pause Qameṣ) takes its place. More particularly it is to be remarked that—

(a) The unchangeable vowels ־ִי, וֹ, וּ (§ 25 b) are always retained, even under such circumstances; hence inf. abs. Qal שָׁלוֹחַ, part. pass. שָׁלוּחַ, Hiph. הִשְׁלִיחַ, imperf. יַשְׁלִיחַ, part. מַשְׁלִיחַ. So also the less firm ō in the inf. constr. שְׁלֹח is almost always retained: cf., however, שְׁלַח, in close connexion with a substantive, Is 58⁹, and גְּוַע Nu 20³. Examples of the infinitive with suffixes are בְּבָרְחֲךָ Gn 35¹; בְּפִגְעוֹ Nu 35¹⁹; לְרִבְעָהּ Lv 18²³, &c.

b (b) The imperfect and imperative Qal almost always have ă in the second syllable, sometimes, no doubt, due simply to the influence of the guttural (for a tone-long ō, originally ŭ), but sometimes as being the original vowel, thus יִשְׁלַח, שְׁלַח, &c.; with suffixes יִשְׁלָחֵ֫נִי, שְׁלָחֵ֫נִי, see § 60 c. Exceptions, in the imperfect אסלוח Jer 5⁷, K^eth. (אֶסְלַח Q^erê); in the imperative טְבֹחַ Gn 43¹⁶. On such cases as אֶפְשֳׂעָה Is 27⁴, cf. § 10 h.

c (c) Where Ṣere would be the regular vowel of the final syllable, both forms (with ē^a and ă) are sometimes in use; the choice of one or the other is decided by the special circumstances of the tone, i.e.:—

d Rem. 1. In the absolute state of the participle Qal, Piʿēl and Hithpaʿēl, the forms שֹׁלֵחַ (with suff. שֹֽׁלְחִי, but שֹׁלֵֽחֲךָ), מְשַׁלֵּחַ (with suff. מְשַׁלּֽחֲךָ), and מִשְׁתַּגֵּעַ are used exclusively; except in verbs ל״ע where we find, in close connexion, also נֹטַע ψ 94⁹, רֹגַע Is 51¹⁵, Jer 31³⁵, רֹקַע Is 42⁵, 44²⁴, רוֹקַע ψ 136⁶, שֹׁסָע Lv 11⁷, all with the tone on the last syllable.—The part. Puʿal is מְרֻבַּע Ez 45² according to the best authorities (Kittel מְרֻבָּע).

e 2. Similarly, in the imperf. and inf. Niphʿal, and in the perf. inf. and imperf. Piʿēl the (probably more original) form with ă commonly occurs in the body of the sentence, and the fuller form with ē^a in pause (and even with the lesser distinctives, e.g. with D^ehi ψ 86⁴ in the imperative Piʿēl; with Ṭiphḥa 1 K 12³² in the infinitive Piʿēl; Jer 4³¹ imperfect Hithpaʿēl; Jer 16⁶ imperfect Niphʿal), cf. e.g. יִגָּרַע Nu 27⁴, with יִגָּרֵעַֽ 36³; וַיִּשָּׁבַע Dt 1³⁴, even with retraction of the tone in the inf. abs. Niphʿal הִשָּׁבַע Nu 30³ (elsewhere הִשָּׁבֵעַ Jer 7⁹, 12¹⁶ twice, in each case without the pause); תְּבַקַּע־ Hb 3⁹, with תְּבַקֵּֽעַ Ez 13¹¹; בַּלַּע to devour Hb 1¹³, Nu 4²⁰ with בַּלֵּ֑עַ La 2⁸; for infinitive Hithpaʿēl, cf. Is 28²⁰. The infinitive absolute Piʿē̇l has the from שַׁלֵּחַ Dt 22⁷, 1 K 11²²; the infinitive construct, on the other hand, when without the pause is always as שַׁלַּח except לְשַׁלֵּחַ Ex 10⁴.— יְזַבֵּחַ Hb 1¹⁶ has ē, though not in pause, and even וַיְזַבֵּחַ 2 K 16⁴, 2 Ch 28⁴; but a in pause in the imperative Niphʿal הֵֽאָנַ֑ח Ez 21¹¹; jussive Piʿēl תְּאַחַר ψ 40¹⁸; cf. § 52 n. An example of ă in the imperative Piʿēl under the influence of a final ר is כַּתַּר־ Jb 36², in the imperfect Niphʿal וָתֵּֽעָצַר Nu 17¹³, &c.—In יַפְרִחַ Jb 14⁹ (cf. ψ 92¹⁴, Pr 14¹¹), Barth (see above, § 63 n) finds an i-imperfect of Qal, since the intransitive meaning is only found in Qal.

f 3. In the 2nd sing. masc. of the imperative, and in the forms of the jussive and imperfect consecutive of Hiphʿîl which end in gutturals, a alone occurs, e.g. הַצְלַח prosper thou, יַבְטַח let him make to trust, וַיַּצְמַח and he made to grow (so in Hithpalpel יִחְמַהְמַהּ, &c., Hb 2³); even in pause וַיַּצְלַ֑ח 1 Ch 29²³, and, with the best authorities, וְיוֹכָֽח 1 Ch 12¹⁷; וְישַֽׁעֲכֶ Is 35⁴ is perhaps to be emended into וְישִֽׁעֲ׳ (=וְיוֹשִׁיע׳).—In the infinitive absolute Ṣere remains, e.g. הַגְבֵּהַּ to make high; as infinitive construct חוֹכַח also occurs in close connexion (Jb 6²⁶); on הוֹשֵׁעַ as infinitive construct (1 S 25^26.33), cf. § 53 k.

g 2. When the guttural with quiescent Š^ewâ stands at the end of a syllable, the ordinary strong form remains when not connected with suffixes, e.g. שָׁלַ֫חְתָּ, שָׁלַ֫חְתִּי. But in the 2nd sing. fem. perfect a helping-Pathaḥ takes the place of the Š^ewâ, שָׁכַ֫חַתְּ Jer 13²⁵ (§ 28 e); also in, 1 K 14³, לָקַ֫חַתְּ is to be read, not לָקַחְתְּ.

h Rem. The soft combination with compound Š^ewâ occurs only in the 1st plur. perfect with suffixes, since in these forms the tone is thrown one place farther forward, e.g. יְדַֽעֲנ֫וּךָ we know thee, Ho 8² (cf. Gn 26²⁹, ψ 44¹⁸, 132⁶). Before the suffixes ךָ and בֶם, the guttural must have ־ֲ, e.g. אֶשְׁלָֽחֲךָ I will send thee, 1 S 16¹; וָֽאֲשַׁלֵּֽחֲךָ Gn 31²⁷; אַשְׁמִֽיעֲךָ Jer 18².

On the weak verbs ל״א, see especially § 74.

1. Verbs ל״ה in which the ה is consonantal obviously belong also to this class, e.g. גָּבַהּ to be high, תָּמַהּ to be astonished, מָהַהּ (only in Hithpalpel) to delay.