Hust v. Lines

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Hust v. Lines
by Wiley Blount Rutledge
Syllabus
900682Hust v. Lines — SyllabusWiley Blount Rutledge
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

328 U.S. 707

Hust  v.  Lines

Argument Commenced April 22, 1946, and Suspended, Resumed, and Concluded April29, 1946.

Decided June 10, 1946.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Oct. 21, 1946.

Messrs. B. A. Green, of Portland, Or., and Abraham E. Freedman, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Messrs. Erskine Wood and Erskine B. Wood, both of Portland, Or., for respondent.

[Argument of Counsel from page 708 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse