In re Commitment of Edward S.

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
In re Commitment of Edward S.  (1990) 
by the Supreme Court of New Jersey
Court Documents
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion

Supreme Court of New Jersey

118 N.J. 118; 570 A.2d 917


No. A-156  Argued: April 24, 1989 --- Decided: March 8, 1990

Angela V. Passalacqua, Assistant Deputy Public Advocate, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Advocate, attorney).

James P. Lynch, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Samuel Asbell, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).

For affirmance and remandment — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN. Opposed — None. The opinion of the Court was delivered by WILENTZ, C.J. HANDLER, J., concurring. HANDLER, J., concurring in result.

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).

OOjs UI icon alert destructive black-darkred.svg A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.