In re Permian Basin Area Rate Cases

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


In re Permian Basin Area Rate Cases
John Marshall Harlan II
Syllabus
932717In re Permian Basin Area Rate Cases — SyllabusJohn Marshall Harlan II
Court Documents
Dissenting Opinion
Douglas

United States Supreme Court

390 U.S. 747

In re Permian Basin Area Rate Cases

 Argued: Dec. 5, 6 and 7, 1967. --- Decided: May 1, 1968

See 392 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 2050.

[Syllabus from pages 747-751 intentionally omitted]

Richard A. Solomon, Washington, D.C., for Federal Power commission.

J. Calvin Simpson, San Francisco, Cal., for Public Utilities Commission of Calif.

Malcolm H. Furbush, San Francisco, Cal., for Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

John Ormasa, Los Angeles, Cal., for Pacific Lighting Gas Supply Co. and others.

C. Hayden Ames, San Francisco, Cal., for San Diego Gas and Electric Co. All in support of order of the Federal Power Commission.

Bruce R. Merrill, Houston, Tex., for Continental Oil Co.

Crawford C. Martin, Hillsboro, Tex., for State of Texas.

Boston E. Witt, Santa Fe, N.M., for State of New Mexico.

Herbert W. Varner, Houston, Tex., for Superior Oil Co.

Robert W. Henderson, Dallas, Tex., for Hunt Oil Co.

J. Evans Attwell, Houston, Tex., for Perry R. Bass and others.

Justin R. Wolf, Washington, D.C., for Standard Oil Co. of Texas.

James L. Armour, Houston, Tex., for the Mobil Oil Co.

Louis Flax, Washington, D.C., for Sun Oil Co.

Carroll L. Gilliam, Washington, D.C., and Oliver L. Stone, New York City, for Amerada Petroleum Corp. and others. All in opposition to order of Federal Power Commission.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 752-754 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse