National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010/Division A/Title II/Subtitle B
Appearance
SUBTITLE B — PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND LIMITATIONS
[edit]Sec. 211. Extension and enhancement of Global Research Watch Program.
[edit]- (a) Limitation on Availability of Certain Funds for Military Departments Pending Provision of Assistance Under Program.—Subsection (d) of section 2365 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
"(3) (A) Funds available to a military department for a fiscal year for monitoring or analyzing the research activities and capabilities of foreign nations may not be obligated or expended until the Director certifies to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics that the Secretary of such military department has provided the assistance required under paragraph (2).
- "(B) The limitation in subparagraph (A) shall not be construed to alter or effect the availability to a military department of funds for intelligence activities.".
- (b) Four-year Extension of Program.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended by striking "September 30, 2011" and inserting "September 30, 2015."
Sec. 212. Permanent Authority for the Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel.
[edit]- Section 2521 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
- (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
- (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e):
"(e) Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel.—
- "(1) There is in the Department of Defense the Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel.
- "(2) (A) The Chair of the Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel shall be the head of the Panel. The Chair shall be appointed, on a rotating basis, from among the appropriate personnel of the military department and Defense Agencies with manufacturing technology programs.
- "(B) The Panel shall be composed of at least one individual from among appropriate personnel of each military department and Defense Agency with manufacturing technology programs. The Panel may include as ex-officio members such individuals from other government organizations, academia, and industry as the Chair considers appropriate.
- "(3) The purposes of the Panel shall be as follows:
- "(A) To identify and integrate requirements for the program.
- "(B) To conduct joint planning for the program.
- "(C) To develop joint strategies for the program.
- "(4) In carrying out the purposes specified in paragraph (3), the Panel shall perform the functions as follows:
- "(A) Conduct comprehensive reviews and assessments of defense-related manufacturing issues being addressed by the defense manufacturing technology programs and related activities of the Department of Defense.
- "(B) Execute strategic planning to identify joint planning opportunities for increased cooperation in the development and implementation of technological products and the leveraging of funding for such purposes with the private sector and other government agencies.
- "(C) Ensure the integration and coordination of requirements and programs under the program with the Office of the Secretary of Defense and other national-level initiatives, including the establishment of information exchange processes with other government agencies, private industry, academia, and professional associations.
- "(D) Conduct such other functions as the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall specify.
- "(5) The Panel shall report to and receive direction from the Director of Defense Research and Engineering on manufacturing technology issues of multi-service concern and application.
- "(6) The administrative expenses of the Panel shall be borne by each military department and Defense Agency with manufacturing technology programs in such manner as the Panel shall provide.".
Sec. 213. Elimination of report requirements regarding Defense Science and Technology Program.
[edit]- Section 212 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (10 U.S.C. 2501 note) is repealed.
Sec. 214. Authorization for the Secretary of the Navy to purchase infrastructure and Government purpose rights license associated with the Navy-Marine Corps intranet.
[edit]- (a) Purchases Authorized.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into one or more contracts for the purchase of infrastructure and Government purchase rights for any or all technical data, computer software, and computer software documentation used or created under the Navy-Marine Corps Intranet multiyear contract, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, if the Secretary determines that such a purchase would be in the best interest of the Department of the Navy.
- (b) Contract Requirements.—Under a contract entered into under this section, the Secretary may purchase any discrete component or item of technical data, computer software, or computer software documentation of the Navy-Marine Corps Intranet and may obligate the Government only to amounts provided in advance in appropriations Acts specifically for the purpose of the contract. This section shall not apply to any purchases using funds available to the Department of the Navy for any fiscal year that begins before October 1, 2010.
- (c) Limitation.—A contract entered into under this section may not, in any way, commit the Secretary or the Government to purchase any additional components or other items of technical data, computer software, or computer software documentation in subsequent years.
- (d) Limitation on Liability.—A contract entered into under this section shall limit the amount of Government liability under the contract to the amount of appropriations available for such purpose at the time the Secretary enters into the contract or on the date an option is exercised.
- (e) Purchase Before End of Contract Period.—Nothing in this section and nothing in any contract entered into under this section shall preclude the Secretary from purchasing the infrastructure and Government purpose rights for all technical data, computer software, and computer software documentation used or created under the Navy-Marine Corps Intranet multiyear contract, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, prior to the end of the contract period, for whatever reason the Secretary determine is appropriate.
Sec. 215. Limitation on expenditure of funds for Joint Multi-Mission Submersible program.
[edit]- None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this or any other Act for fiscal year 2010 may be obligated or expended for the Joint Multi-Mission Submersible program to proceed beyond Milestone B approval (as that term is defined in section 2366 (e)(7) of title 10, United States Code) until the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence—
- (1) completes an assessment on the feasibility of a cost-sharing agreement between the Department of Defense and the intelligence community (as that term is defined in section 3 (4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a (4)), for the Joint Multi-Mission Submersible program;
- (2) submits to the congressional defense committees and the intelligence committees (as that term is defined in action 3 (7) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a (7)) the assessment referred to in paragraph (1); and
- (3) certifies to the congressional defense committees and the intelligence committees that any agreement developed pursuant to the assessment referred to in paragraph (1) represents the most effective and affordable means of delivery for meeting a validated program requirement.
Sec. 216. Separate program elements required for research and development of individual body armor and associated components.
[edit]- In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2011, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that within each research, development, test, and evaluation account of each military department a separate, dedicated program element is assigned to the research and development of individual body armor and associated components.
Sec. 217. Separate procurement and research, development, test, and evaluation line items and program elements for the F-35B and F-35C joint strike fighter aircraft.
[edit]- In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2011, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that within the Navy research, development, test, and evaluation account and the Navy aircraft procurement account, a separate, dedicated line item and program element is assigned to each of the F-35B aircraft and the F-35C aircraft, to the extent that such accounts include funding for each such aircraft.
Sec. 218. Restriction on obligation of funds for Army tactical ground network program pending receipt of report.
[edit]- (a) Limitation on Obligation of Research and Development Funding.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2010 for research and development for the Army, for the program elements specified in subsection (c), not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until 30 days after the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits to Congress a report on the acquisition strategy, requirements, and cost estimates for the Army tactical ground network program.
- (b) Army Tactical Ground Network Program Defined.—For the purposes of subsection (a), the term "Army tactical ground network program" means the new tactical ground network major defense acquisition program derived from the Future Combat Systems Brigade Combat Team program network, and directed to be initiated by the memorandum entitled "Future Combat Systems Brigade Combat Team Acquisition Decision Memorandum," which was signed by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics on June 23, 2009.
- (c) Army Tactical Ground Network Program Elements Specified.—The program elements specified in this subsection are the following:
- (1) Future Combat Systems of Systems Engineering and Program Management.
- (2) Future Combat Systems Sustainment and Training Research and Development.
- (3) Any other program element specified by the Secretary of Defense to fund the Army tactical ground network program.
Sec. 219. Programs for ground combat vehicle and self-propelled howitzer capabilities for the Army.
[edit]- (a) Programs Required.—
- (1) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a separate program to achieve each of the following:
- (A) The development, test, and fielding of an operationally effective, suitable, survivable, and affordable next generation ground combat vehicle for the Army.
- (B) The development, test, and fielding of an operationally effective, suitable, survivable, and affordable next generation self-propelled howitzer capability for the Army.
- (2) Compliance with certain acquisition requirements.—Each program under paragraph (1) shall comply with the requirements of the Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009, and the amendments made by that Act.
- (b) Strategy and Plan for Acquisition.—
- (1) In general.—Not later than March 31, 2010, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a strategy and plan for the acquisition of weapon systems under the programs required by subsection (a). Each strategy and plan shall include measurable goals and objectives for the acquisition of such weapon systems, and shall identify all proposed major development, testing, procurement, and fielding events toward the achievement of such goals and objectives.
- (2) Elements.—In developing each strategy and plan under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider the following:
- (A) A single vehicle or family of vehicles utilizing a common chassis and automotive components.
- (B) The incorporation of weapon, vehicle, communications, network, and system of systems common operating environment technologies developed under the Future Combat Systems program.
- (c) Annual Reports.—
- (1) Reports required.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, at the same time the President submits to Congress the budget for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2015 (as submitted pursuant to section 1105 (a) of title 31, United States Code), a report on the investments proposed to be made under such budget with respect to each program required by subsection (a).
- (2) Elements.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall set forth, for the fiscal year covered by the budget with which such report is submitted—
- (A) the manner in which amounts requested in such budget would be available for each program required by subsection (a); and
- (B) an assessment of the extent to which utilizing such amount in such manner would improve ground combat capabilities for the Army.
Sec. 220. Guidance on budget justification materials describing funding requested for operation, sustainment, modernization, and personnel of major ranges and test facilities.
[edit]- (a) Guidance on Budget Justification Materials.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and the Director of the Department of Defense Test Resource Management Center, shall issue guidance clarifying and standardizing the information required in budget justification materials describing amounts to be requested in the budget of the President for a fiscal year (as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 (a) of title 31, United States Code) for funding for each facility and resource of the Major Range and Test Facility Base in connection with each of the following:
- (1) Operation.
- (2) Sustainment.
- (3) Investment and modernization.
- (4) Government personnel.
- (5) Contractor personnel.
- (b) Applicability.—The guidance issued under subsection (a) shall apply with respect to budgets of the President for fiscal years after fiscal year 2010.
- (c) Major Range and Test Facility Base Defined.—In this section, the term "Major Range and Test Facility Base" has the meaning given that term in section 196 (h) of title 10, United States Code.
Sec. 221. Assessment of technological maturity and integration risk of Army modernization programs.
[edit]- (a) Assessment Required.—The Director of Defense Research and Engineering shall, in consultation with the Director of Developmental Test and Evaluation, review and assess the technological maturity and integration risk of critical technologies (as jointly identified by the Director and the Secretary of the Army for purposes of this section) of Army modernization programs and appropriate associated systems and programs, including the programs as follows:
- (1) Ground Combat Vehicle.
- (2) Future Combat Systems network hardware and software.
- (3) Warfighter Information Network—Tactical, Increment 3.
- (4) Appropriate portions of the Joint Tactical Radio System, including Ground Mobile Radios, Handheld, Manpack, Small Form Fit Radios, and Network Enterprise Domain.
- (5) Non-Line of Sight Launch System.
- (6) Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle.
- (7) Class I Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
- (8) Class IV Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
- (9) Multifunction Utility/Logistics Equipment Vehicle.
- (10) Tactical Unattended Ground Sensors.
- (11) Urban Unattended Ground Sensors.
- (12) Any other programs jointly identified by the Director and the Secretary for purposes of this section.
- (b) Report.—Not later than nine months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the technological maturity and integration risk of critical technologies of Army modernization programs and associated systems and programs covered by the review and assessment required under subsection (a), as determined pursuant to that assessment.
Sec. 222. Assessment of activities for technology modernization of the combat vehicle and armored tactical wheeled vehicle fleets.
[edit]- (a) Independent Assessment of Strategy Required.—
- (1) In general.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an appropriate entity independent of the United States Government to conduct an independent assessment of current, anticipated, and potential research, development, test, and evaluation activities for or applicable to the modernization of the combat vehicle fleet and armored tactical wheeled vehicle fleet of the Department of Defense.
- (2) Access to information and resources.—The Secretary shall provide the entity with which the Secretary enters into a contract under paragraph (1) with access to such information and resources as are appropriate for the entity to conduct the assessment required by that paragraph.
- (b) Reports.—
- (1) In general.—The contract required by subsection (a) shall provide that the entity with which the Secretary enters into a contract under that subsection shall submit to the Secretary and the congressional defense committees—
- (A) an interim report on the assessment required by that subsection by not alter than July 31, 2010; and
- (B) a final report on such assessment by not later than December 31, 2010.
- (2) Elements.—Each of the reports required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
- (A) A detailed discussion of the requirements and capability needs identified or proposed for current and prospective combat vehicles and armored tactical wheeled vehicles.
- (B) An identification of capability gaps for combat vehicles and armored tactical wheeled vehicles based on lessons learned from recent conflicts and an assessment of emerging threats.
- (C) An identification of the critical technology elements or integration risks associated with particular categories of combat vehicles and armored tactical wheeled vehicles, and with particular missions of such vehicles.
- (D) Recommendations with respect to actions that could be taken to develop and deploy, during the ten-year period beginning on the date of the submittal of the report, critical technology capabilities to address the capability gaps identified pursuant to subparagraph (B), including an identification of high priority science and technology, research and engineering, and prototyping opportunities.
- (E) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate.