Page:A History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages-Volume I .pdf/369

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
INEFFECTUAL OPPOSITION.
349

von Albrecht, are all described as having been previously inquisitors.[1]

It is not to be imagined that this gigantic structure which overshadowed Christendom was allowed to establish itself wholly without opposition, despite the favor of popes and kings. When we come to consider the details of its history we shall find numerous cases of popular resistance, desperate and isolated struggles, crushed remorselessly before revolt could so extend as to become dangerous. It required, indeed, courage to foolhardiness for any one to raise hand or voice against an inquisitor, no matter how cruel or nefarious were his actions. Under the canon law, any one, from the meanest to the highest, who opposed or impeded in any way the functions of an inquisitor, or gave aid or counsel to those who did so, became at once ipso facto excommunicate. After the lapse of a year in this condition he was legally a heretic to be handed over without further ceremony to the secular arm for burning, without trial and without forgiveness. The awful authority which thus shrouded the inquisitor was rendered yet more terrible by the elasticity of definition given to the crime of impeding the Holy Office and the tireless tenacity with which those guilty of it were pursued. If friendly death came to shield them, the Inquisition attacked their memories, and visited their offences upon their children and grandchildren.[2]

All unorganized efforts of insubordination were easily repressed. Had the bishops united in resistance, they could readily have prevented the serious encroachment on their jurisdiction and influence, and have saved their flocks from the horrors in store for them. There was no unity of action, however, among the prelates. Some


  1. Pegnae App. ad. Eymeric. pp. 66-7. — Arch, de Tlnq. de Carcass. (Doat, XXXII. 143, 147).— Eymeric. Direct. Inq. pp. 537-8.— Albert. Repert. Inq. Ed. 1494, s. v. Delegatus. — Franz Ehrle, Archiv fiir Litteratur- u. Kirchengeschichte, 1886, p. 158. — Lami, Antichita Toscane, p. 583. — Archivio di Firenze, Riformagioni, Classe V. No. 129, fol. 46, 62-70.— Martene Ampl. Collect. VI. 344.
  2. MSS. Bib. Nat., fonds latin. No. 4270, fol. 146. In the trial of Friar Bernard Délicieux, in 1319, it was held that he was guilty of "impeding" the Inquisition because, among other acts, he had been concerned in enlarging somewhat the powers of the agents appointed by the city of Albi to prosecute their appeal to Pope Clement V. against their bishop and inquisitor (lb. fol. 165).