Page:Alabama v. North Carolina, 560 U.S. (2010) slip opinion.pdf/33

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Cite as: 560 U. S. ____ (2010)
3

Opinion of KENNEDY, J.

draw; imposes no limitation on this right; and explicitly provides that the Compact shall not be construed to abridge the sovereign rights of any party State. See ante, at 20–21. Federalism concerns also counsel reluctance to find that a State has implicitly restricted its sovereignty in such a manner.

The Court is therefore correct to reject plaintiffs’ final exception. With these observations, I join the Court’s opinion with the exception of Part II–E.