Page:Books Condemned to be Burnt - James Anson Farrer.djvu/36

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Books Condemned to be Burnt.

Ludovicum XIII. (1625), and the same author's Mysteria Politica (1625), were both sentenced to be burnt; also the Jesuit Sanctarel's Tractatus de Hæresi (1625), which claimed for the Pope the right to dispose, not only of the thrones, but also of the lives of princes. This doctrine was approved by the General of the Jesuits, but, under threat of being accounted guilty of treason, expressly disclaimed by the Jesuits as a body. In resisting such pretensions, the Sorbonne deserved well of France and of humanity. In 1665, the Châtelet ordered to be burnt Claude Joly's Recueil des Maximes vhitabks et importantes pour l' Institution du Roiy contre lafausse et pemicieuse politique de Cardinal prétendu surintendant de l'education de Louis XIV. (1652); a book which, if it had been regarded instead of being burnt, might have altered the character of that pernicious devastator, and therefore of history itself, very much for the better. About the same time, Milton's Pro Populo Anglicano Defensio, not to be burnt in England till the Restoration, had a foretaste in Paris of its ultimate fate. Eustache le Noble's satire against the Dutch, Dialogue d' Esope et de Mercure, and burnt by the executioner at Amsterdam, may complete the list