Page:Cartoon Network, LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc.djvu/2

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

Before: WALKER, SACK, and LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judges.

Appeal from an entry of summary judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denny Chin, Judge). Defendant-Appellant Cablevision Systems Corporation argues that the district court erred in holding that its proposed "Remote Storage" Digital Video Recorder system violates the Copyright Act by infringing plaintiffs' exclusive rights of reproduction and public performance.

REVERSED, VACATED, and REMANDED.

  JEFFREY A. LAMKEN (Robert K. Kry and Joshua A. Klein, on the brief), Baker Botts L.L.P., Washington, D.C., and Timothy A. Macht (on the brief), New York, N.Y., for Defendants-Appellants.
  KATHERINE B. FORREST (Antony L. Ryan, on the brief), Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, N.Y., for Plaintiffs-Appellees The Cartoon Network LP, LLLP, et al.
  ROBERT ALAN GARRETT (Hadrian R. Katz, Jon Michaels, Peter L. Zimroth, and Eleanor Lackman, on the brief), Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiffs-Appellees Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, et al.
  Marc E. Isserles, Cohen & Gresser LLP, New York, N.Y., for Amici Curiae Law Professors.
  Henry A. Lanman, Trachtenberg Rodes & Friedberg LLP, New York, N.Y., for Amicus Curiae Professor Timothy Wu.

-2-