Page:Current Strategies for Engineering Controls in Nanomaterial Production and Downstream Handling Processes.pdf/46

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

3.4.2.1 Fume Hood Enclosures

In 2006, a survey was conducted of international nanotechnology firms and research laboratories that reported manufacturing, handling, researching, or using nanomaterials [Conti et al. 2008]. All organizations participating in the survey reported using some type of engineering control. The most common exposure control used was the traditional laboratory fume hood with two-thirds of firms reporting the use of a fume hood to reduce exposure to workers. These devices have been used for many years in research laboratories to protect workers from chemical and biological hazards. The design and operation of the fume hood is an important factor when considering good exposure control. Traditional designs for laboratory fume hoods create airflow patterns that form recirculation regions inside the hood. In addition, airflow around the worker, as shown in Figure 9, creates a negative pressure region downstream of the worker, which may provide a mechanism for the transport of materials out of the hood as well as into the breathing zone of the worker.

Recent research has shown that the laboratory fume hood may allow the release of nanomaterials during their handling and manipulation [Tsai et al. 2009a]. This research evaluated exposures related to the handling (i.e., scooping and pouring) of powder nanoalumina and nanosilver in a constant air volume (CAV) hood, a bypass hood, and a variable air volume (VAV) hood. This study showed that the CAV fume hood, in which face velocity varies inversely with sash height, allowed the release of significant amounts of nanoparticles during pouring and transferring activities involving nanoalumina. The particles that escaped the fume hood were circulated to the general room air and were not cleared by the general ventilation system for 1/2–2 hours. Sash heights both above and below the recommended height (corresponding to a face velocity of 80–120 ft/min) may lead to increased potential exposure for the user. In contrast, more modern hoods such as the VAV hood, which is designed to maintain the hood face velocity in a desired range regardless of sash height, yielded better containment of nanoparticles than the other hoods tested.

Fume hood airflow with body
Fume hood airflow with body

Figure 9. Schematic illustration of how wakes caused by the human body can cause transport of air contaminants into the worker's breathing zone

Current Strategies for Engineering Controls in Nanomaterial Production and Downstream Handling Processes

31