Page:Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1827) Vol 1.djvu/472

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
448
THE DECLINE AND FALL

CHAP. XIII.

of life, and was protected, in some measure, by the opinion of political utility. The form and the seat of government were intimately blended together; nor was it esteemed possible to transport the one without destroying the other[1]. But the sovereignty of the capital was gradually annihilated in the extent of conquest; the provinces rose to the same level, and the vanquished nations acquired the name and privileges, without imbibing the partial affections, of Romans. During a long period, however, the remains of the ancient constitution, and the influence of custom, preserved the dignity of Rome. The emperors, though perhaps of African or Illyrian extraction, respected their adopted country, as the seat of their power, and the centre of their extensive dominions. The emergencies of war very frequently required their presence on the frontiers; but Diocletian and Maximian were the first Roman princes who fixed, in time of peace, their ordinary residence in the provinces; and their conduct, however it might be suggested by private motives, was justified by very specious considerations of policy. Their residence at Milan The court of the emperor of the west was, for the most part, established at Milan, whose situation, at the foot of the Alps, appeared far more convenient than that of Rome, for the important purpose of watching the motions of the barbarians of Germany. Milan soon assumed the splendour of an imperial city. The houses are described as numerous and well built; the manners of the people as polished and liberal. A circus, a theatre, a mint, a palace, baths which bore the name of their founder Maximian, porticoes adorned with statues, and a double circumference of walls, contributed to the beauty of the new capital; nor did it seem oppressed even by the proximity of Rome[2]. To

  1. Julius Caesar was reproached with the intention of removing the empire to Ilium or Alexandria. See Sueton. in Caesar, c. 79. According to the ingenious conjecture of Le Fevre and Dacier, the third ode of the third book of Horace was intended to divert Augustus from the execution of a similar design.
  2. See Aurelius Victor, who likewise mentions the buildings erected by