Page:Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology (1870) - Volume 3.djvu/736

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
loc cit.
loc cit.

724 SATURNINUS. demagogue, was probably a grandson of the pre- ceding. He possessed considerable powers of oratory, but was of a loose and dissolute character ; and he might probably have passed through life much like most other Roman nobles, had he not received an insult from the senate at the com- mencement of his public career, which rankled in his breast and made him a furious opponent of the aristocratical party. In his quaestorship, B.C. 104, he was stationed at Ostia, and as Rome was suffer- ing at that time from a scarcity of com, and the senate thought that Saturninus did not make sufficient exertions to supply the city, they super- seded him and entrusted the provisioning of the capital to M. Scaurus (Diod. Exc. xxxvi. p. G08, ed. Wess. ; Cic. pro Seoct. 17, de Harusp. Resp. 20). Saturninus forthwith threw himself into the foremost ranks of the democratical party, and entered into a close alliance with Marius and his friends. He soon acquired great popularity, and was elected tribune of the plebs for the year B. c. 102. We have scarcely any accounts of his con- duct in his first tribunate ; but he did enough to earn the hatred of the aristocracy, and accordingly Metellus Numidicus, who was at that time censor, endeavoured to expel him from the senate on the ground of immorality, but was prevented from carrying his purpose into execution by the oppo- sition of his colleague. Saturninus vowed ven- geance against Metellus, which he was soon able to gratify by the assistance of Marius, who was also a personal enemy of Metellus. He resolved to become a candidate for the tribunate for the years, c. 100. At the same time Glaucia, who next to Saturninus was the greatest demagogue of the day, offered himself as a candidate for the praetorship, and Marius for the consulship. If they all three carried their elections, the power of the state, they thought, would be in their hands ; they might easily ruin Metellus, and crush the aristocracy. But in the midst of these projects Saturninus was nearly ruined by a skilful move- ment of his enemies. In the course of ac. 101, and before the comitia for the election of the ma- gistrates for the ensuing year were held, the am- bassadors of Mithridates appeared at Rome, bring- ing with them large sums of money for the purpose of bribing the leading senators. As soon as this became known to Saturninus, he not only attacked the senators with the utmost vehemence, but heaped the greatest insults upon the ambassadors. Upon the latter complaining of this violation of the law of nations, the senate eagerly availed themselves of the opportunity, and brought Satur- ninus to trial for the offence he had committed. As the judices at that time consisted exclusively of senators, liis condemnation appeared certain. Saturninus in the utmost alarm put on the dress of a suppliant, and endeavoured by his appearance, as well as by his words, to excite the commiseration of the people. In this he completely succeeded ; the people regarded hira as a martyr to their cause, and on the day of his trial assembled in such crowds around the court, that the judices were overawed, and contrary to general expectation pro- nounced a verdict of acquittal (Diod. Exc. p. 631, ed. Wess). In the comitia which soon followed, Marius was elected consul and Glaucia praetor, but Saturninus was not equally successful. He lost his election chiefly through the exertions of A. Nonius, who distinguished himself by his ve- SATURNINUS. hement attacks upon Glaucia and Saturninus, and was chosen in his stead. But Nonius paid dearly for his honour, for in the same evening he was murdered by the emissaries of Glaucia and Satur- ninus ; and early the following morning before the forum was full, Saturninus was chosen to fill up the vacancJ^ As soon as he had entered upon his tribunate (b. c. 100), he brought forward an agra- rian law for dividing the lands in Gaul, which had been lately occupied by the Cimbri, and added to the law a clause, that, if it was enacted by the people, the senate should swear obedience to it within five days, and that whoever refused to do so should be expelled from the senate, and pay a fine of twenty talents. This clause was specially aimed at Me- tellus, who, it was well known, would refuse to obey the requisition. But in order to make sure of a refusal on the part of Metellus, Marius rose in the senate and declared that he would never take the oath, and Metellus made the same decla- ration ; but when the law had been passed, and Saturninus summoned the senators to the rostra to comply with the demands of the law, Marius, to the astonishment of all, immediately took the oath, and advised the senate to follow his example. Me- tellus alone refused compliance ; and on the fol- lowing day Saturninus sent his viator to drag the ex-censor out of the senate-house. Not content with his victory, he brought forward a bill to punish him with exile. The friends of Metellus were ready to take up arms in his defence ; but Metellus declined their assistance, and withdrew privately from the city. Saturninus brought forward other popular measures, of which our information is very scanty. He proposed a Lex Fnunentaria, by which the state was to sell corn to the people at 5-6ths of an as for the modius (Auctor, ad Herenn. i. 12), and also a law for founding new colonies in Sicil}-, Achaia, and Macedonia (Aurel. Vict, de Vir. III. 73 ; comp. Cic. pro Ball). 21). In the comitia for the election of the magistrates for the following year, Saturninus obtained the tribunate for the third time, and along with him there was chosen a cer- tain Equitius, a runaway slave, who pretended to be a son of Tib. Gracchus. Glaucia was at the same time a candidate for the consulship ; the two other candidates Avere M. Antonius and C. Mera- mius. The election of Antonius was certain, and the struggle lay between Glaucia and Memmius. As the latter seemed likely to carry his election, Saturninus and Glaucia hired some ruffians who murdered him openly in the comitia. All sensible people had previously become alarmed at the mad conduct of Saturninus and his associates ; and this last act produced a complete reaction against him. The senate felt themselves now sufficiently strong to declare them public enemies, and ordered the consuls to put them down by force. Marius was unwilling to act against his associates, but he had no alternative, and his backwardness was com- pensated by the zeal of others. Driven out of the forum, Saturninus, Glaucia, and the quaestor Sau- feius took refuge in the Capitol, but the partisans of the senate cut off the pipes which supplied the Capitol with water, before Marius began to move against them. Unable to hold out any longer, they surrendered to Marius. The latter did all he could to save their lives : as soon as they descended from the Capitol, he placed them for security in the Curia Hostilia, but the mob pulled off the tiles of the senate-house, and pelted them with the tilea