Page:Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography Volume I Part 1.djvu/531

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

CAPUA.

  • nd lii Diilet in circnmrerenca, mnd httd ssvm cniM,

the >ite of moet of which ma; bs Hill determiiiaj. Tbe name of the Pnna Jovia hn.1 tfen pn'Mired to HI b; I.iv; (uTL 11). but trithont indicatiof; ita ntoUiai: it wu pmbahly on the E. sid« of the town, (adnf; Mt TiUa, an which stood a reiebnted tonple of japitn', Tim Bitnatioa of the Porta Vnl- tnrTwnsis, Atcllaiia, and Cainana, mentioned in in- ■criptioni, is aufficientlj indiuteil by tliiir napec- tin names. The reinatna of a triumphal irch uu atilJ visible nenr the amphitheatre, and Ihou of ano- ther tnbuiited till the middle cf tha seventeenth ceiitarj. Soma eliRht trw«> onlj an foand of the thotre, the axiitence of which is alio recorded bj an tiiscri|itioD' Tbe nuns of the amphithcatfe, on the cjmtraij. are extensive, and show that it must hate been, when perfect, one of the most ma^iiifi- rent stmclnm of the kind fiislinK hi Iu)j, Moi- ■ ■ a Neapoli' • • - • a of it, i n the inscription which ncoids its reatcmtion by Ksdrian. The date of its original construclion ia nnknawn. Maiioccbi, In mWiftun Amphilhtalri Campani niu/iun Comntentariat, 4to. Neap. 1737.) Tbe ither remains at Capua are described by Pntilli [Via Appia, p. 260— 318) ana by Romanelli (rd. iii. p. 578— S84)i iscriplioni ucriptions fboiid at Capua are collected bj lli Siifa. Keap. p. 384—322). Captia nas possessed in the period of its pnv- perit; and power of an eiteiuuve territory, erlt^nd- tnCBppsrenllyas fsr as the month of the Vultumni. Of this the portion S. of that river was diHtin- fHIiiafaed, in hiter times at least, by the name of the Aqeb CAHT-AHUa, as the proper tTritory of the city, while that on the N. ^de uf the Valtnnns wu known OS the Falkrhub Agek, a name sometimca applied to the whole of the fertile tracts between tbe VnUumos and the mountain langee that bonnd the plain on the N.; somelimes restricttd t.> the val«m portion oS this tract, at the li»t of the Mas- lican Hill); while the eut«m half of the plain, M the foot of Mods CbIKcoIo, extending from Cnlea to Casilinnm, was distlnsulsked as the CAUrtis STKtr utTia.(Liv:iiiL 13; Cic A Ltg. Affr. !. 7, ii. 3! ; Suet Caa. 30.) The citns of Capua, with the name of the city, Iiate all of them Oson Ir^^ends: they are almost nil oT copper, tlinse of silver brin;; of eitrrme rarity. Bnt numismatiits are agr«H that certain silver the legend " Roma" and " Romano," bnt or^tBr- tainly not of RmiMi fabric, were coinod at Capua durinif the periud between its oblaining the Boman Civitas and the Second Punic War. (Mommsen, KSraitck. MStmratn, p. 249; Uilllncen, .Vumu- naliqae de Vllaiie, p. 313.) [E. H. D.] made in htersia tjtuated near the modemSermn, between the ruined forta of Zermgrad and Ttchrm^x. (Pmcgpi da Afd^. i>. 6. p. 288.) rL.S.1 CAPUT VADA. [Brachodes,] CABACCA. [Arriaca.] CABACATES. The " Tribod, VMEiona, et Cura-ates," are mentioned by Tacitus {^Hitl. iv. 70) in his history of the war of Civilis. Some of the commentators on Taiitiu wonld alter the name, but it ocean nowhere ebe. D'Anville, finding no phice for these people among the Triboei, Nemetea. and Vangionet, lupposn that they may have occnped the tnu^ between the Kara {_Naht) and the Rhint, and that Moguntlacum (Maim) may have been their chief town; lac it happens that we never find Ihe name of the people mentioned who had Maint. It may then have belonged to the Caracates. WalckenaerobservM(Ceoj.Tol.ii.p,378) that in the environs of ifoine there occur the names Kar- bach, Karlkk, KaneeOer, KardHaaer. which may ba taken to be srane confirmation of D'Anville's con- jotture. [G. L.] CARACE'NI(Kapiiini'ol).a tribe of the Samnitea, which according to Ptolemy inhabited the mut northern ^rt of SamDium, bordering on the Peligni and the Freutani ; bat more eepecially the upper valley of the Sagnu (Simffro). The onlj' city that ha osalgni to them ii ADFiDEirA, and their name is not mentioned by any other geographer. But it is generally snppoeed that the Caeucini (Kiylwrai) of Zonaraa, whom be speaks of aa a Saninite pcoiile (viii.7). are the same with the Corocmi of Ptolemy. He doscribea them as pooseasing a town or etrong- bdld, which was not token by tile Roman consuls Q. Gollns and C. Fabius without difflculiy. This town haa Iwen supposed by local topographera to be the same with the modem CoMld di Sangro, which seems, hum the inscriptions and other re- nuuni discoiered then, to have been an ancient town,butthere ie noaothority fcr this. Nor is there any greond for identifying the Corentini of Pliny .i7),w; author among the Frenlani. with the Camcem, (Bomanelii, vol. ii. pp. 483, 490.) [E. H. fl.] CABAE (KdfKU >c^*iai, Diod. ivii. 37), ■ small place menlionod by Kodorus, and probably in Sitta- cene, one of the SE. districts of Assyria. It has been conjectured by Uonnert (v. 3, p. 342) that it was situated in the Drighbourbood of A^urvSAirn. on the river Holwan. [V.] CA'KALIS, or CATtALES (the plnral ftim. is used by the best Latin writers: KnpaAii: Eth. Co- ralituins : Cogliari), a nty of Sardinia, the meet con- siderable in the whole island, ntuated on the S. coast, on the extensive gulf which derived from it the name of ^us Caialitanus {KapvXtrafhi kAK- wDi, Plol. iii. 3. § 4). Its fuundstion is exprvesly assigned to the Carthaginians (Paui. i. 17. % 9; Clandian, B. Gild. 520) ; and from ita opportune si- tnntion for commnnicaiion with Africa *e well as its excellent port, it donbtleas assumed under their go- lemment the same important position which «■» find it occupying under the B«nans. Ko mention of it is found on the ocmsion of the Roman cnnquest of tbe islsnd; but during the Second Punic War, It was the hcad^quarters of the praetor, T. Idanlius, from whence be cotiicd on his operotinu ogurat