After the interregnum of 1871, the following were the champions:—
| 1872. | Tom Morris, jun., St Andrews | 166—at Prestwick. |
| 1873. | Tom Kidd, St Andrews | 179—at St Andrews. |
| 1874. | Mungo Park, Musselburgh | 159—at Musselburgh. |
| 1875. | Willie Park, Musselburgh | 166—at Prestwick. |
| 1876. | Bob Martin, St Andrews | 176—at St Andrews. |
| 1877. | Jamie Anderson, St Andrews | 160—at Musselburgh. |
| 1878. | Jamie Anderson, St Andrews | 157—at Prestwick. |
| 1879. | Jamie Anderson, St Andrews | 170—at St Andrews. |
| 1880. | Bob Fergusson, Musselburgh | 162—at Musselburgh. |
| 1881. | Bob Fergusson, Musselburgh | 170—at Prestwick. |
| 1882. | Bob Fergusson, Musselburgh | 171—at St Andrews. |
| 1883. | W. Fernie, Dumfries | 159—at Musselburgh. |
| 1884. | Jack Simpson, Carnoustie | 160—at Prestwick. |
| 1885. | Bob Martin, St Andrews | 171—at St Andrews. |
| 1886. | D. Brown, Musselburgh | 157—at Musselburgh. |
| 1887. | Willie Park, jun., Musselburgh | 161—at Prestwick. |
| 1888. | Jack Burns, Warwick | 171—at St Andrews. |
| 1889. | Willie Park, jun., Musselburgh | 155—at Musselburgh. |
| 1890. | Mr John Ball, jun., Hoylake | 164—at Prestwick. |
| 1891. | Hugh Kirkaldy, St Andrews | 166—at St Andrews. |
| 1892. | Mr H. H. Hilton, Hoylake | 305—at Muirfield. |
| 1893. | W. Auchterlonie, St Andrews | 322—at Prestwick. |
| 1894. | J. H. Taylor, Winchester | 326—at Sandwich. |
| 1895. | J. H. Taylor, Winchester | 322—at St Andrews. |
| 1896. | H. Vardon, Scarborough | 316—at Muirfield. |
| 1897. | Mr H. H. Hilton, Hoylake | 314—at Hoylake. |
| 1898. | H. Vardon, Scarborough | 307—at Prestwick. |
| 1899. | H. Vardon, Scarborough | 310—at Sandwich. |
| 1900. | J. H. Taylor, Richmond | 309—at St Andrews. |
| 1901. | J. Braid, Romford | 309—at Muirfield. |
| 1902. | A. Herd, Huddersfield | 307—at Hoylake. |
| 1903. | H. Vardon, Ganton | 300—at Prestwick. |
| 1904. | J. White, Sunningdale | 296—at Sandwich. |
| 1905. | J. Braid, Walton Heath | 318—at St Andrews. |
| 1906. | J. Braid, Walton Heath | 300—at Muirfield. |
| 1907. | Arnaud Massey, La Boulie | 312—at Hoylake. |
| 1908. | J. Braid, Walton Heath | 291—at Prestwick. |
| 1909. | J. H. Taylor, Richmond | 295—at Deal. |
| 1910. | J. Braid, Walton Heath | 298—at St Andrews. |
The Amateur Championship is of far more recent institution
| 1886. | Mr Horace Hutchinson | at St Andrews. |
| 1887. | Mr Horace Hutchinson | at Hoylake. |
| 1888. | Mr John Ball | at Prestwick. |
| 1889. | Mr J. E. Laidlay | at St Andrews. |
| 1890. | Mr John Ball | at Hoylake. |
| 1891. | Mr J. E. Laidlay | at St Andrews. |
| 1892. | Mr John Ball | at Sandwich. |
| 1893. | Mr P. Anderson | at Prestwick. |
| 1894. | Mr John Ball | at Hoylake. |
| 1895. | Mr L. Balfour-Melville | at St Andrews. |
| 1896. | Mr F. G. Tait | at Sandwich. |
| 1897. | Mr J. T. Allan | at Muirfield. |
| 1898. | Mr John Ball | at Prestwick. |
| 1899. | Mr F. G. Tait | at Hoylake. |
| 1900. | Mr H. H. Hilton | at Sandwich. |
| 1901. | Mr H. H. Hilton | at St Andrews. |
| 1902. | Mr C. Hutchings | at Hoylake. |
| 1903. | Mr R. Maxwell | at Muirfield. |
| 1904. | Mr W. J. Travis | at Sandwich. |
| 1905. | Mr A. G. Barry | at St Andrews. |
| 1906. | Mr J. Robb | at Hoylake. |
| 1907. | Mr John Ball | at St Andrews. |
| 1908. | Mr E. A. Lassen | at Sandwich. |
| 1909. | Mr Robert Maxwell | at Muirfield. |
| 1910. | Mr John Ball | at Hoylake. |
The Ladies’ Championship was started in 1893.
| 1893. | Lady M. Scott | at St Annes. |
| 1894. | Lady M. Scott | at Littlestone. |
| 1895. | Lady M. Scott | at Portrush. |
| 1896. | Miss A. B. Pascoe | at Hoylake. |
| 1897. | Miss E. C. Orr | at Gullane. |
| 1898. | Miss L. Thompson | at Yarmouth. |
| 1899. | Miss M. Hezlet | at Newcastle. |
| 1900. | Miss R. K. Adair | at Westward Ho. |
| 1901. | Miss M. A. Graham | at Aberdovy. |
| 1902. | Miss M. Hezlet | at Deal. |
| 1903. | Miss R. K. Adair | at Portrush. |
| 1904. | Miss L. Dod | at Troon. |
| 1905. | Miss B. Thompson | at Cromer. |
| 1906. | Mrs Kennion | at Burnham. |
| 1907. | Miss M. Hezlet | at Newcastle (Co. Down). |
| 1908. | Miss M. Titterton | at St Andrews. |
| 1909. | Miss D. Campbell | at Birkdale. |
| 1910. | Miss Grant Suttie | at Westward Ho. |
There have been some slight changes of detail and arrangement as time has gone on, in the rules of the game (the latest edition of the Rules should be consulted). A new class of golfer has arisen, requiring a code of rules framed rather more exactly than the older code. The Scottish golfer, who was “teethed” on a golf club, as Mr Andrew Lang has described it, imbibed all the traditions of the game with his natural sustenance. Very few rules sufficed for him. But when the Englishman, and still more the American (less in touch with the traditions), began to play golf as a new game, then they began to ask for a code of rules that should be lucid and illuminating on every point—an ideal perhaps impossible to realize. It was found, at least, that the code put forward by the Royal and Ancient Club of St Andrews did not realize it adequately. Nevertheless the new golfers were very loyal indeed to the club that had ever of old held, by tacit consent, the position of fount of golfing legislation. The Royal and Ancient Club was appealed to by English golfers to step into the place, analogous to that of the Marylebone Cricket Club in cricket, that they were both willing and anxious to give it. It was a place that the Club at St Andrews did not in the least wish to occupy, but the honour was thrust so insistently upon it, that there was no declining. The latest effort to meet the demands for some more satisfactory legislation on the thousand and one points that continually must arise for decision in course of playing a game of such variety as golf, consists of the appointment of a standing committee, called the “Rules of Golf Committee.” Its members all belong to the Royal and Ancient Club; but since this club draws its membership from all parts of the United Kingdom, this restriction is quite consistent with a very general representation of the views of north, south, east and west—from Westward Ho and Sandwich to Dornoch, and all the many first-rate links of Ireland—on the committee. Ireland has, indeed, some of the best links in the kingdom, and yields to neither Scotland nor England in enthusiasm for the game. This committee, after a general revision of the rules into the form in which they now stand, consider every month, either by meeting or by correspondence, the questions that are sent up to it by clubs or by individuals; and the committee’s answers to these questions have the force of law until they have come before the next general meeting of the Royal and Ancient Club at St Andrews, which may confirm or may reject them at will. The ladies of Great Britain manage otherwise. They have a Golfing Union which settles questions for them; but since this union itself accepts as binding the answers given by the Rules of Golf Committee, they really arrive at the same conclusions by a slightly different path. Nor does the American Union, governing the play of men and women alike in the States, really act differently. The Americans naturally reserve to themselves freedom to make their own rules, but in practice they conform to the legislation of Scotland, with the exception of a more drastic definition of the status of the amateur player, and certain differences as to the clubs used.
A considerable modification has been effected in the implements of the game. The tendency of the modern wooden clubs is to be short in the head as compared with the clubs of, say, 1880 or 1885. The advantage claimed (probably with justice) for this shape is that it masses the weight behind the point on which the ball is struck. Better material in the wood of the club is a consequence of the increased demand for these articles and the increased competition among their makers. Whereas under the old conditions a few workers at the few greens then in existence were enough to supply the golfing wants, now there is a very large industry in golf club and ball making, which not only employs workers in the local club-makers’ shops all the kingdom over, but is an important branch of the commerce of the stores and of the big athletic outfitters, both in Great Britain and in the United States. By far the largest modification in the game since the change to gutta-percha balls from balls of leather-covering stuffed with feathers, is due to the American invention of the india-rubber cased balls. Practically it is as an American invention that it is still regarded, although the British law courts decided, after a lengthy trial (1905), that there had been “prior users” of the principle of the balls’ manufacture, and therefore that the patent of Mr Haskell, by whose name the
