- . f, . H - » ~ ., appears ' therefore —that in v the D sagging' oggmg majority- of ships, whose departure YB'-'S t M ' M ' . Eb D flee- Ma imum Maximum . IQ y e ec-, .f 1 't d' 1 m t i }' ht of Water. Coriisiiggiiic Tiiiixgiliin Sign tionyovei' the Compressive Tensile Gig?" tion over the glhgslgiitggmeffegg lgthé Stress. Stress; ca ' whole length. ' Stress. Stress. ' whole length. . ., = . amount of the maximum longitudinal

Feet bending -moment; nevertheless; it

0 ' 1.7 2.3 12 100 11,300 10 .9 considerably increases the bending

5 2-9 3-7 12,100 12,000 2-7 2-6 16,000 11,800 m<2I f? @ntSEf1eaf tpehende t, 4 4-1 - 5-4 11,400 11,400 4-2 4-0 15,100 10,800 de be @%t9 €=1, ;;§ 1s 1S xHv@€—3 5-2 6-6 11,400 11,500 5-3 5-0 ' '13,0§)0 10,400 sa € b Y 0?1¥3 1;gCG l><¥S;;0HSh§ > 2 6-0 7-7 10,800 11,100 6-1 5-8 121,700 9,600 lefllilll Uumwo é -ng eps P 1 6-5 8-4 10,700 10,600 6-6 6-4 12,700 9,90Q . W ef* fm. ave cies a .'f'.Wa"e Dry 6 7 8 6 10000 10600 6.8 6.6 H300 0300 trough, intermediate positions of Note.—The maximum stresses above are approximate, 'and are recorded in order variation of Eiwith the stress in the material .may be seen. Tons per square-inch units -are. employed.

the values for E found from the dock experiments. The maximum stresses were as follows § that

the

ship, assumed originally stationary, the height of the C.G.'al'Jové its mean position becomes

equilibrium are assumed to be

given by y=u. sinlt where' T, is the

apparent semi-period of the Wave. On

taking into account the massof the

T12 . 'lrl T . vrt

RXW SII1Ff~*T'S'1T'. »

1 1 .

where T.-=-qi E- =period of dip in still watery ii 1 Condition. Stress-Tons per square Inch.

V . Keel. Deck.

Maximum observed stresses

when hogging .... 2 -9 C. ' 2 -0 T.

Maximum observed stresses

when sagging .... 5-4 T. ' 2 '5 C.

Calculated stress (sagging) when

in a wave hollow of height

215th length .... 7-1 T. 5-3 C.

C. = Compressive. T. = Tensile. 1

It appears from these experiments that (at least in shi s of similar character to H.M.S. “Wolf”) the stresses corresponding to any articular external conditions closely agree with those calculated from the usual theory of bending; on the other hand the waves encountered during the sea trials were such that the maximum stress then obtained was considerably less than that in the condition assumed for the standard calculations. Finally, the material of the ship was subjected -in dock to a tensile stress of nearly 9 tons and a compressive stress of nearly 7 tons per sq. in. without distress.

While dealing with longitudinal bending, some of the refinements suggested for calculating stresses among waves may be cited, although the additional labour involved in their application has prevented their introduction in general practice., Since the distribution of pressure in the Water of a wave system differs from that in still water, the buoyancy of a vessel or the resultant vertical thrust of the water is then not equal to the weight of the water displaced; and the position of the ship when in equilibrium and the stresses upon it are changed in consequence. By assuming the pressure at any point of the water to be in accordance with the trochoidal theory of wave motion, and undisturbed b the intrusion of the ship, the equilibrium position can be obtainedyand the modified stresses evaluated. This process was first applied to ships by Mr W. E. Smith (Trans. I.N.A., 1883), who obtained the arith-metical sum of the sagging and hogging moments on vessels placed in the trough and on the crest of a wave, thereby eliminating the effect of the distribution of weight; and compared it with the sum of the moments as ordinarily obtained. The correction for the ships considered involved a reduction of the bending, moment to about § of the value calculated in the. ordinary manner, and in a torpedo-boat destroyer a reduction of about 10 % has been obtained. This reduction increases as the draught and fullness of the shi s are increased, and the bending moment on a square-bilged ship dieeply immersed is almost uninfluenced by wave motion, since the reduction in orbital motion at considerable depths below the surface ensures the bottom of a fairly deep ship being in comparatively undisturbed water.

In the foregoing the vessel is assumed to occupy at every instant a horizontal position on the wave with the correct displacement; a ship proceeding perpendicularly to the crests of a wave system will, however, un ergo heaving and itching oscillations which lead to a further modification in the bending moment obtained (see paper by T. C. Read, Tram. I .N.A., 1890). - Considering first thee ect of pitching only, imagine the ship at her proper displacement (allowance being made for the altered buoyancy of the wave system as before), but momentarily out of her correct trim; the longitudinal restoring couple, due to the wedges of immersion and emersion, is balance by the moment of the reversed mass-accelerations of the component parts. If the ship is longitudinally symmetrical about her midship section, one half of the moment of the restoring forces and one half of the moment of the reversed mass-accelerations about armdships are due to the forward end, and one half to the after end. These moments are therefore equal and opposite for each half of the ship and have' no influence on the midship bending mornentl It P

W is the displacement, and € the tons per foot iknmersion; the -resistance to vertical motion eing neglected. ' When T and T, are nearly equal, allowance has to be made for the resistance by using a process of graphic integration. On applying the correction to two vessels, " and, comparing the bending moments in their positions of the wave, 'given by the formula, with those in, the equilibrium position, the effect 0n.the maximum hogging moment was found small; but the sagging moment of a moderately fine vessel was increased by over 20 %, and that of a full vessel by about IO %.§ Allowance has also been made for the effect of, the superposed heaving, pitching and rolling oscillations undergone by a ship moving obliquely across the crests of a wave system (see papers by Captain Kriloff, Trans. I.N.A., 1896 and 1898)- . - , The maximum calculated stress on vessels inclined to considerable angles of heel has been found in some instances to be slightly greater than that for the upright condition; and the stress on the material towards theends is then usually more nearly equal to that arnidships. In addition to the direct stresses on keel, bottom, and upper works resulting from longitudinal bending, shearing stresses are experienced whichin some cases are of appreciable magnitude. The in- ~ . i . .. » FA' A

tensity of shear stress in the side plating is equal to %; where F is the shearing force over the transverse section, A2 the moment about the neutral axis of the sectional area- above or below a horizontal line through the point considered, and t- the thickness of-side plating. This stress is usually greatest at or near a quartef of the length from either end and-at the height of the neutral axis, since here F and AZ respectively attain their maximum vali1es. In'-some cases the thickness of plating and arrangement of riveting have to be specially considered in relation to these shearing stresses. ' . f Thestresses due to transverse bending are not, mgenerai, capable of definite determination; -as, however, they'are freréuently -severe when the ship is in dry dock, and may also attain consi er- ' - ~able magnitude during 'heavy rolling, a' means of com-;' ';';s" paring the transverse strength of vessels is of some- imdb interest. A transverse bulkhead forms a region of almost 1 3 infinite transverse stiffness, and it is therefore difficult in ships internally subdivided by 'numerous bulkheads, to determine how far the. stresses at intermediate sections are influenced by- the neighbouring bulkheads. In many, .

vessels carrying cargo, ” ”

however, in which trans- ' ' ~ =

verse bulkheads- 'are ' -p

widely spaced, a section ~ ' ' '

midway along ahold may

be so~~far removed from '

all bulkheads as to be ' ' J '

uninfluenced by“ their ' ' ' '~ 'local

support; and the

following' method has - ' '

been proposed for comparing

the transverse Q' -' "

0 C6 °°

I)-

a

I R.-

strengths of' such ' ” ' dS' -' ' .g .~. ships: "

A frame and a strip ' fof

plating one 'frame

space in width are re—Fig.

6-0.

arded as a stiff extensible bar subjected to the known exterrlal orces and to the unknown tension, 'shearing force, and .bending moment, at any fixed point. ' - Q

Let OP (fig. 60) be a portion- of the framing under consideration; O being the keel, and Ox, Dy, horizontal and vertical axes.

Q§ ;»'¢Qng;defafiq;; of the forces on the 'arc OQ, which are in