Page:EB1911 - Volume 25.djvu/1051

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

who have found work elsewhere or been replaced by others. Though this figure is the best general index of the importance of the disputes of each year, it is but a rough approximation to the time actually lost through disputes.

 Year.  Principal Disputes of the Year. All other Disputes.

Trade and Locality. Number of
Duration in
 Working Days. 
 Number of 
Number of
Duration in
 Working Days. 

Coal Miners (Federated Districts)
Coal Miners (South Wales and Monmouth)
Coal Miners (Scotland)
Boot and Shoe Operatives
Engineers, Machinemen and others
Engineers, Machinemen and others—continued
Coal Miners (South Wales and Monmouth)
613 244,301 7,830,765
1894 70,000  928 255,248 3,929,010
1895 46,000  744 217,123 4,160,670
1897 47,500  863 182,767 4,614,523
1898 710 153,907 2,521,478

For example, if a strike causes a postponement or accumulation of work, the extra demand for labour, and the overtime worked after its conclusion, may partially compensate for the stoppage. On the other hand, if a dispute should drive away trade or cause the closing of works, it may lessen the field of employment for a long period after its termination, and such lost time cannot be taken into account in the estimates of “aggregate duration.”

For these reasons all estimates of wages lost through disputes are somewhat fallacious. The real importance of strikes lies less in the value of the actual time consumed by their duration, than in their indirect effects on the organization and effectiveness of the industry, and on the relations of employer to employed, and also in their reaction on the conditions of allied trades. The comparative insignificance of the actual loss to production owing to the mere loss of time caused by strikes will be seen from the fact that the total duration of strikes during the seven years 1901-1907, if spread over the entire adult male working population, would be equivalent to less than the loss of one-third of a day per head per annum. As a matter of fact, however, the loss owing to strikes is very unequally distributed over the industrial population. In large groups of industries, e.g. agriculture, strikes are of rare occurrence. In others, such as the building trades, they are frequent, but mostly small and local; while in mining they are not only frequent and often prolonged, but in many cases they involve large numbers of persons and extend over wide areas. Thus on an average of the seven years 1901-1907 there were 43 disputes annually in the building trades, and 133 in mining and quarrying, but the latter disputes have involved nearly seventeen times as many persons and had an aggregate duration nearly six times as great. Intermediate between these groups of trades is the metal, engineering and shipbuilding group, in which, more perhaps than in any other group, the importance of disputes varies according to the state of trade.

Group of Trades. Mean Annual Percentage of
 Total Number 
 employed who 
were affected
by Disputes.
Percentage of
 Working Time 
occupied by

 Number of 
Number of
 (directly and 
 Duration in 

 Building 43  5,260  234,651  0.5 0.07
 Mining and Quarrying 133  87,509  1,348,289  8.7 0.45
 Metal, Engineering and Shipbuilding  95  22,470  534,549  1.6 0.13
 Textile 90  27,736  326,468  2.3 0.09
 Clothing 36  4,992  104,619  0.7 0.05
 Other 72  9,047  180,793  0.2 0.01

 All Industries, except
 Agricultural Labourers,
 Seamen and Domestic Servants 
469  157,014  2,729,369  1.6 0.09

The principal facts relating to the distribution of trade disputes among the more important groups of trades are given in the above table for the mean of the seven years 1901-1907.

It would be natural to expect that trade disputes would be most prevalent at or just after a turn in the tide of employment, when there is most room for bona-fide disagreement as to the conditions of the labour market. These are undoubtedly the most critical times in the relations of employers and employed, but the disturbing influence of accidental causes is too great to enable any regular law of variations in disputes to be established by statistical evidence. It is to be remembered that in recent years there has been a great development in the means available for avoiding stoppages by conciliatory action (see Arbitration and Conciliation), and this of itself would greatly complicate the task of tracing any correspondence between the prevalence of actual stoppages and the state of employment. Broadly it may be said that the great majority of upward and downward changes of wages are settled nowadays without strikes, and in many trades actual stoppages, instead of being a normal feature in the relations between employer and employed, are rather to be looked on as cases of accidental breakdown of the recognized machinery of negotiation.

The causes of disputes are of course very varied, embracing all the matters relating to conditions of Causes. employment on which differences may arise between employers and employed. Experience shows, however, that the great bulk of disputes relate to questions of wages, a much smaller proportion to hours of labour, and the balance to a large number of miscellaneous questions, such as the employment of persons or classes obnoxious to the strikers on the ground that they do not belong to their union, or have worked against its interests, or because they are held to have no “right” to the particular occupation on which they are employed, either on account of not having gone through the recognized training or of belonging to another trade. Among this class of strikes are to be included the so-called “demarcation” disputes between two bodies of workmen as to the limits of their trades, which frequently cause suspension of work by both groups, to the great inconvenience of the employer. Strikes are also not uncommon on the question of trade unionism pure and simple—i.e. to obtain or defend freedom to belong to a union, or to act through its agency in negotiations with employers. This question enters more or less as a factor into a large number of disputes, most usually, however, as a secondary cause or object, so that it does not appear prominently in the tabulation of causes in the board of trade statistics, which is based on principal causes only. Thus the formulated demands of the strikers are usually for improved conditions of work, the question of “recognition” of the trade union only arising incidentally when the parties attempt to negotiate as to these demands. The following table, showing the principal causes of disputes for the seven years 1901-1907, is based on the official statistics:—

 Percentage Proportion of Work-people directly affected by 
Disputes in the seven years, 1901-1907, relating to

of Wages.
of Hours.
of particular
Classes or

54.5 3.6 9.2 18.2 14.5