Page:Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr.pdf/14

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 14 of 58

SCC Page:
D.P. Wadhwa J

I agree that the appeal be dismissed. However, I
D. P. WADHWA, J.- (partly concurring) I agree that the appeal be dismissed. However, I

S.C. AGRAWAL J.
Special leave granted.
AGRAWAL, J. (partly dissenting) – Special leave granted.
KOSHAL, J.
On a perusal of the judgment prepared by my learned brother, Krishna Iyer, J., I agree respectfully with findings (2) to (11), (13) and (14) enumerated by him
Koshal, J. (partly dissenting) – On a perusal of the judgment prepared by my learned brother, Krishna Iyer, J., I agree respectfully with findings (2) to (11), (13) and (14) enumerated by him

8. Judges on whose behalf opinion given: Expression such as “for himself and Pathak, C.J.”, or “Fazal Ali and Rangnath Mishra, JJ.” etc. are added to the original text.

For example,
A uniform style has been mentioned by SCC to take care of the fact that which judges have signed the Judgment.

Raw text obtained from Registry:

SCC Page:
RANGANATH MISRA, J.
We have had the benefit of reading the judgment passed
The Judgments of the Court were delivered by RANGANATH MISRA, J. (for himself and Pathak, C.J.) (concurring)
RANGANATHAN, J.

The seeds of the present controversy were sown as early as in 1946. The Judgments of the Court were delivered by

RANGANATHAN, J. (for