Page:Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr.pdf/18

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 18 of 58

emphasis supplied on verification.

For example,
Raw text obtained from Registry:

SCC Page:
The Rajasthan High Court in CIT v Rangnath Bangur opined:

“.…that once a reassessment proceeding is initiated, the original order of assessment is set aside or ceases to be operative. The finality of such an assessment order is wiped out and a fresh order of assessment would take the place of and completely substitute the initial order of assessment. It is, therefore, clear that when

The Rajasthan High Court in CIT v. Rangnath Bangur opined: (p.498)

“[T]hat once a reassessment proceeding is initiated, the original order of assessment is set aside or ceases to be operative. The finality of such an assessment order is wiped out and a fresh order of assessment would take the place of and completely substitute the initial order of assessment. It is, therefore, clear that when

and said:

“reassessment proceedings cannot be contained only to such income which has escaped assessment, but the entire assessment
and said: (p. 503)

“[R]eassessment proceedings cannot be confined only to such income which has escaped assessment, but the entire assessment
Five Judges:

“the Constitution is the fundamental law of the land and it is wholly unnecessary to provide in any law made by the legislature that anything done in disregard