Page:Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr.pdf/20

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 20 of 58

behalf.”
manner as may be prescribed duties of excise on all excisable goods which are produced or manufactured in India as, and at the rates, set forth in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
manner as may be prescribed duties of excise on all excisable goods which are produced or manufactured in India as, and at the rates, set forth in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

13. Matter inadvertently missed in quoted extracts is supplied.

For example,
Incorporation of matter missing in quotations from cases.

Raw text obtained from Registry:

SCC Page:

Where there is no express exclusion the examination of the remedies and the scheme of the particular Act to find out the intendment becomes necessary to see if the statute creates a special right or a liability and provides for the determination of the right
Where there is no express exclusion the examination of the remedies and the scheme of the particular Act to find out the intendment becomes necessary and the result of the inquiry may be decisive. In the latter case
Mr Justice M.K. Chawla holding that parties have no locus standi.
Mr Justice M.K. Chawla holding that Mr. H.S. Chowdhary and other intervening parties have no locus standi.

“38. State to secure a social order for the promotion of welfare of the people. (1) The State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social, economic and political, shall inform all