Page:Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr.pdf/26

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 26 of 58


passed by Madhya Pradesh High Court respectively in Misc. Petitions No. 1371 of 1992 M.P. No. 1980 of 1992 and M.P. No. 2315 of 1992. All the said Misc. Petitions were filed before the Madhya Pradesh High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.
passed by Madhya Pradesh High Court respectively in Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 1371, 1980 and 2315 of 1992. All the said miscellaneous petitions were filed before the Madhya Pradesh High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution

* The changes have been underlined.

(SCC HAS UNIQUE STYLE)
18. There are certain norms followed at SCC for giving case names.

For example,

Raw text obtained from Registry:

SCC Page:

Budh Prakash Jai Prakash v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur [1952 A.L.J. 332]
Budh Prakash Jai Prakash v. STO
Indian Aluminium Cables Limited vs. State of Haryana
Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd. v. State of Haryana
Trilok Nath Tiku & Another v. State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others
Triloki Nath Tiku v. State of J & K (I)
R. Chitralekha and Anr. v. State of Mysore & Ors. 1964 (6) SCR 368 at 388 and Triloki Nath v. J & K State 1969 (1) SCR 103 at 105 and K.C. Vasanth Kumar v. Karnataka 1985 Supp. (1) SCR 352

R. Chitralekha v. State of Mysore and Triloki Nath v.