Page:Enquiry into plants (Volume 1).pdf/475

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

ENQUIRY INTO PLANTS, V. IV. 2–4

Of differences in the keeping quality of timber.

[1]Naturally proof against decay are cypress prickly cedar ebony nettle-tree box olive wild olive resinous fir aria (holm-oak) oak sweet chestnut. Of these the wood of the cypress seems to last longest; at least the cypress-wood at Ephesus, of which the doors of the modern temple were made, lay stored up[2] for four generations. And this is the only wood which takes a fine polish, wherefore they make of it valuable articles. Of the others the least liable to decay after the wood of the cypress and thyine-wood is, they say, that of the mulberry, which is also strong and easily worked: when it becomes old, this wood turns black like that of the nettle-tree.

[3]Again whether a given wood is not liable to decay may depend on the purpose to which it is put and the conditions to which it is subjected: thus the elm does not decay if exposed to the air, nor the oak if it is buried or soaked in water; for it appears to be entirely proof against decay: wherefore they build vessels of it for use on rivers and on lakes, but in sea-water it rots, though other woods last all the better; which is natural, as they become seasoned with the brine.

[4]The beech also seems to be proof against decay in water and to be improved by being soaked. The sweet chestnut under like treatment is also proof against decay. They say that the wood of the fir is more liable to be eaten by the teredon than that of the silver-fir; for that the latter is dry, while the fir has a sweet taste, and that this is more so, the more the wood is soaked with resin[5]; they go on to

  1. Plin. 16. 213.
  2. τεθησαυρισμένα … ἔκειτο conj. Bentley; τεθησαυρισμέναι … ἔκειντο Ald. H.; P has ἔκειτο.
  3. Plin. 16. 218.
  4. Plin. 16. 218 and 219.
  5. cf. 3. 9. 4.
441