However, if one should wish[1] to be precise, one would find[2] that even of these some are impartial and as it were amphibious, such as tamarisk willow alder, and that others even of those which are admitted to be plants of the dry land sometimes live in the sea,[3] as palm squill asphodel. But to consider all these exceptions and, in general, to consider in such a manner is not the right way to proceed. For in such matters too nature certainly does not thus go by any hard and fast law. Our distinctions therefore and the study of plants in general must be understood accordingly. [4]To return—these plants as well as all others will be found to differ, as has been said, both in the shape of the whole and in the differences between the parts, either as to having or not having certain parts, or as to having a greater or less number of parts, or as to having them differently arranged, or because of other differences[5] such as we have already mentioned. And it is perhaps also proper to take into account the situation in which each plant naturally grows or does not grow. For this is an important distinction, and specially characteristic of plants, because they are united to the ground and not free from it like animals.
Characteristic differences in the parts of plants, whether general, special, or seen in qualities and properties.
V. Next we must try to give the differences as to particular parts, in the first instance speaking broadly of those of a general character,[6] and then
- ↑ θέλοι conj. Sch.; θέλει Ald.H.
- ↑ εὓροι conj. Sch.; εὓρη Ald.; εὓρῃ H.
- ↑ Presumably as being sometimes found on the shore below high-water mark.
- ↑ ἃπαντα . . . ζῶα. This passage seems not to belong here (W.).
- ↑ τρόποι conj. Sch.; τόποι UMVAId.
- ↑ i.e. those which divide plants into large classes (e.g. evergreen and deciduous).
