Jump to content

Page:Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp., 220 Ark. 601 (1952).pdf/10

From Wikisource
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
610
[220

What we are trying to do is, to keep the spirit of the constitutional mandate against usury abreast of present day commercial transactions. We give this caveat prospectively, so as not to entrench on property rights acquired by reason of our previous opinions, and this caveat applies to all transactions entered into after this opinion becomes final.

The Chief Justice concurs in part and dissents in part.