that they did not interfere with the paramount rights of the European discoverers.[1]
§ 154. For the most part at the time of the first grants of the colonial charters, there was not any possession or occupation of the territory by any British emigrants. The main objects of these charters, as stated in the preliminary recitals, was to invite emigrations, to people the country, to found colonies, and to christianize the natives. Even in case of a conquered country, where there are no laws at all existing, or none, which are adapted to a civilized community; or where the laws are silent, or are rejected and none substituted; the territory must be governed acccording to the rules of natural equity and right. And Englishmen removing thither must be deemed to carry with them those rights and privileges, which belong to them in their native country.[2]
§ 155. The very ground, therefore, assumed by England, as the foundation of its title to America, and the invitations to its own subjects to people it, carry along with them a necessary implication, that the plantations, subsequently formed, were to be deemed a part of the ancient dominions; and the subjects inhabiting them to belong to a common country, and to retain their former rights and privileges. The government in its public policy and arrangements, as well as in its charters, proclaimed, that the colonies were established with a view to extend and enlarge the boundaries of the empire. The colonies,- ↑ 4 Wheat. R. 590, 591, 596; 1 Grahame's Hist, of America, 44; 3 Kent's Comm. 311; Worcester v. State of Georgia, 6 Peters's Sup. Ct. Rep. 515.
- ↑ 2 Salk. 411, 412; See also Hall v. Campbell, Cowp. R. 204, 211, 212; 1 Chalm. Ann. 11, 15, 678, 679, 689, 690; 1 Chalm. Opinions, 194; 2 Chalm. Opinions, 202; Chitty on Prerog. ch. 2; 2 Wilson's Law Lect. 48, 49.
