in his talk; but his lion-heart, and keen sense of the ludicrous, alike in himself as in others, redeem them. I should not like to have my motives scrutinized as he would scrutinize them, for I prefer rather to disclose them myself than to be found out; but I was dissatisfied in parting from this remarkable man before having seen him more thoroughly.’
‘Mr. Whipple addressed the meeting at length. His
presence is not imposing, though his face is intellectual.
It is difficult to look at him, for you cannot be taken
prisoner by his eye, while, en revanche, he can look
at you as long as he pleases; and, as usual, with one
who can get the better of his auditors, he does not call
out the best in them. His gestures are remarkably
fine, free, graceful, and expressive. He has no natural
advantages of voice, — for it is without compass, depth,
sweetness, — and has none of the winning tones which
reach the inmost soul, and none of the tones of passionate
energy, which raise you out of your own world into
the speaker's. But his modulation is smooth, measured,
dignified, though occasionally injured by too elaborate
a swell, and his enunciation is admirable.
‘His theme was one which has been so thoroughly discussed that novelty was not to be looked for; but his method and arrangement were excellent, though parts were too much expanded, and the whole might well have been condensed. There were many felicitous popular hits. The humorous touches were skilful, and the illustrations on a broad scale good, though in single images he failed. Altogether, there was a pervading air of ease and mastery, which showed him fit to he a leader of the flock. Though not a man of the Webster
