to an observer, who, with equal feeling, had better powers of observation.
Nothing is more rare than a talent to describe landscape, and, especially, skyscape, or cloudscape, although a vast number of letters, from correspondents between the ages of twenty and thirty, are filled with experiments in this kind. Margaret, in her turn, made many vain attempts, and, to a lover of nature, who knows that every day has new and inimitable lights and shades, one of these descriptions is as vapid as the raptures of a citizen arrived at his first meadow. Of course, he is charmed, but, of course, he cannot tell what he sees, or what pleases him. Yet Margaret often speaks with a certain tenderness and beauty of the impressions made upon her.
TO ——.
‘Fishkill, 25 Nov., 1844. — You would have been happy as I have been in the company of the mountains. They are companions both bold and calm. They exhilarate and they satisfy. To live, too, on the bank of the great river so long, has been the realization of a dream. Though I have been reading and thinking, yet this has been my life.’
‘After they were all in bed,’ she writes from the
“Manse,” in Concord, ‘I went out, and walked till near
twelve. The moonlight filled my heart. These embowering
elms stood in solemn black, the praying monastics
of this holy night; full of grace, in every sense; their
life so full, so hushed; not a leaf stirred.’
‘You say that nature does not keep her promise; but,
surely, she satisfies us now and then for the time.
The drama is always in progress, but here and there
