answer was in the affirmative. Some supported this view of the case by observing, that if it were otherwise, then an automaton could play such games. A few of those who had considerable acquaintance with mathematical science allowed the possibility of machinery being capable of such work; but they most stoutly denied the possibility of contriving such machinery on account of the myriads of combinations which even the simplest games included.
On the first part of my inquiry I soon arrived at a demonstration that every game of skill is susceptible of being played by an automaton.
Further consideration showed that if any position of the men upon the board were assumed (whether that position were possible or impossible), then if the automaton could make the first move rightly, he must be able to win the game, always supposing that, under the given position of the men, that conclusion were possible.
Whatever move the automaton made, another move would be made by his adversary. Now this altered state of the board is one amongst the many positions of the men in which, by the previous paragraph, the automaton was supposed capable of acting.
Hence the question is reduced to that of making the best move under any possible combinations of positions of the men.
Now the several questions the automaton has to consider are of this nature:—
2. If so, has Automaton himself already lost the game?
3. If not, then has Automaton won the game?
