Page:Southern Historical Society Papers volume 04.djvu/84

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
76
Southern Historical Society Papers.

It must be borne in mind, however, that at the time of these operations, I was only a general officer of cavalry, serving under Stuart. My brigade accompanied his movement, and I did not reach Gettysburg until the afternoon of the 2d July, going into line on the extreme left of our army, and fighting the enemy's cavalry in my front on the third.

My personal knowledge of these events, which I fear I have criticised too freely, is not worth much. As a soldier and a graduate of the United States Military Academy, I have, however, formed my own opinions upon the important battle of Gettysburg, based conversations with other officers, including the Commanding-General himself, and the perusal of official reports and histories of both sides.

Among the soldiers now living, and who are accessible, and who know most about that campaign on our side, are Lieutenant-Generals Longstreet, Hood, Anderson and Early, and Major-Generals McLaws, Heth, Wilcox and Trimble; General Pendleton, chief of artillery; Generals Kemper, Lane and Scales; and Colonels Taylor, Marshall and Venable, of General Lee's staff.

Were I writing history, I should like to have the opinions of these officers upon this subject, from which, with the official reports in my possession, I would of course draw and write my own conclusions.

Very respectfully, your obedient servant,

Fitzhugh Lee.


Letter from Colonel William Allan, of Ewell's Staff.

McDonough School,
Owings' Mills, Baltimore County, Md.,

April 26th, 1877,

Rev. J. W. Jones, D. D.:

My Dear Sir: The questions asked in the letter of———of January 21st, 1877, in regard to Gettysburg, are more or less fully