This page has been validated.
Cite as: 576 U. S. ____ (2015)
35
Alito, J., dissenting
considerations rather than move beyond them." Ante, at 21. And it agrees that "racial quotas . . . rais[e] serious constitutional concerns." Ante, at 20. Yet it still reads the FHA to authorize disparate-impact claims. We should avoid, rather than invite, such "difficult constitutional questions." Ante, at 22. By any measure, the Court today makes a serious mistake. *** I would interpret the Fair Housing Act as written and so would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
