124 STAT. 2996 PUBLIC LAW 111–281—OCT. 15, 2010 (B) coordinate with other Federal agencies, the National Maritime Security Advisory Committee, and appropriate State and local government officials through the Area Maritime Security Committees and other existing coordinating committees, to evaluate the waterside security of vessels carrying, and waterfront facilities handling, espe- cially hazardous cargo. (2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The study conducted under this subsection shall include— (A) an analysis of existing risk assessment information relating to waterside security generated by the Coast Guard and Area Maritime Security Committees as part of the Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model; (B) a review and analysis of appropriate roles and responsibilities of maritime stakeholders, including Fed- eral, State, and local law enforcement and industry security personnel, responsible for waterside security of vessels car- rying, and waterfront facilities handling, especially haz- ardous cargo, including— (i) the number of ports in which State and local law enforcement entities are providing any services to enforce Coast Guard-imposed security zones around vessels transiting to, through, or from United States ports or to conduct security patrols in United States ports; (ii) the number of formal agreements entered into between the Coast Guard and State and local law enforcement entities to engage State and local law enforcement entities in the enforcement of Coast Guard-imposed security zones around vessels transiting to, through, or from United States ports or the conduct of port security patrols in United States ports, the duration of those agreements, and the aid that State and local entities are engaged to provide through such agreements; (iii) the extent to which the Coast Guard has set national standards for training, equipment, and resources to ensure that State and local law enforce- ment entities engaged in enforcing Coast Guard- imposed security zones around vessels transiting to, through, or from United States ports or in conducting port security patrols in United States ports (or both) can deter to the maximum extent practicable a transportation security incident; (iv) the extent to which the Coast Guard has assessed the ability of State and local law enforcement entities to carry out the security assignments that they have been engaged to perform, including their ability to meet any national standards for training, equipment, and resources that have been established by the Coast Guard in order to ensure that those entities can deter to the maximum extent practicable a transportation security incident; (v) the extent to which State and local law enforce- ment entities are able to meet national standards for training, equipment, and resources established by the Coast Guard to ensure that those entities can deter
