128 TITLE xm.-THE JuD101AnY.-cu. l1. 24 SGPL, W89. ¢· by the principles and usages of law, be any courts sgppomtod under the 2°¤ “· 13»"· 1- P- 8°· authority of the United States, or to persons holding office under the ` Pmmhm0nT authority of the United States, where a State, or an ambassador, or other U_ S_ ,,_ pct_.,,,;, 3 public minister, or a. consul or VICE-CQIISUI is a party. Dall., 121; E1: park Christy, 3 How., 292; E1: {arte Gordon, 1 Bl., 503; `L'. S. 1-. Hoffman, 4 Wall., 158; Ex_parte \Varm0uth, 17 \Va I., 67. Mandamus: Hayburrfs Case, 2 Dall., 409; U. S. zz Lawrence, 3 Dall., 42; Livingston r. Dorgonois, 7 Cr., 577; Ex parte Burr, 9 Wh., 529; Bank of Columbia 1·. Sweeney, 1 Pet., 567; Ez parte Bradstreet, 4 Pet., 102; Ex parte Crane, 5 Pet., 190; Ex parte Roberts, 6 Pet., 216; Ex parte Davenport, 6 Pet., 661; Ez parte Bradstreet, 6 Pet., 774; Ez parte Bradstreet., 7 Pct., 634; Ex rte Bradstreet, 8 Pet., 588; Life and Fire Ins. Co. 1-. Adams, 9Pet., 571, 573; Er parte ltllayt, 13 Pet., 279; Ex parte Whitney, 13 Pet., 404; E1 parlc Taylor, 14 How., 3; Er rte William Many, 14 How., 24; Stafford 1·. Union Bank of Louisiana, 17 How., 275; Ezra parte Secombe, 19 How., 9; Mussinu v. Cavazos, 20 How., 280; Ex parte Ransom v. City of New York, 20How., 581; U. S., cx rel., v. Addison, 22 How., 174; Ex parte Kentucky 1·. Dennison, 24 How., 66; \Vhita’s Administrator v. L'. S., 1 Bl., 501; E1 parte Fleming, 2 Wall., 759; Commissioner of Patents ·z·. Whitely, 4 Wall., 533—4; Riggs 1·. Johnson County, 6 V\'all., 188; E1: parte Dc Groot, 6 Wall., 497; E.: rte Bmdley, 7 Wall., 364; Ex rtc Graham, 10 Wall., 541; Qommonwcalth 1·. B0l1tvre{lT1l3\\'all., 526; Ex pm-ce RusselIIrl3 Wall., 664; Ex parte Newman, 14 Wall., 152; F.z:parteCutting, 94 U. S., 14; Ea: parte Jordan, 94 U. S., 248; E.:' parte Flippin, 94 U. S., 348; Exparte Loring, 94 L`. S., 418. Isues of fact. Sec. 689. The trial of issues of fact in the Supreme Court, in all actions
- éIé;§‘__""‘—, 1789,6. at law against citizens of the United States, shall be by jury.
,20,s.l3,v.l,p.80. _ _ _ Appellate j,,,.;,- Sec. 690. The buprzame Court shall have appellate ]llI`1SdlCt,l0I] in the diction. cases hereinafter specially provided for. gl Sept£,lZ’83, chg}, s. 13, v.l,p. 80. 3 Mar., 1875, 0. 137, x. 5, r. 18, p. 472.-—Sempl¢· an agar, a ., . Juqlgments in Sec. 691. All final ludgnlants of any circuit court. or of any district clrqurtf <·<>¤¤, 0n court acting as a circuit court, in civil actions brought there by original
%é89;F‘2%.é¤ process, or removed theye from gouljtsl of the several States, and all final
20 S·é2pv'.’1 p. ]lldg'l;l'lB[ll]S of 8.fly C1I‘CLllli (JO\1I;t lll (‘l\'1l 21('tlOI\S PCH10V8d th€l'0 f!‘0[ll 8,lly §;MmC__ ]é03, c_ district court ‘by appeal 01* writ of 0l'l`Ol', where the matter in dispute. 40,s. 2, v. 2, p. 244. exclusive of costs, exceeds the sum or value of two thousand dollars, B4 J§1|y.5l$4%9§- may Ibo rc—exam1ned and reversed 01* B.fH1'lll€‘d in the Supreme Court upon ' fg1d' Eggs c` a wrlt of error. 77,a. 3, r. 18, p. 316. 26 June, 1876, •·. 147, z·. 19, p. 62.—Wils0n r. Daniel, 3 Dall., 401; Williamson v. Kincaid, 4 Dall., 20; Course 1-. Stead, 4 Dall., 22; U. S. r. McDowell, 4 Cr., 316; Durousseau v. U. S., 6 Cr., 307; Wise zu Turnpike Com amy, 7 Cr., 276; Pey- ton r. Robertson 9 Wh., 527; Gordon r. Ogden, 3 Pet., 33; Smitl: T. 1·. Honey, 3 Pet., 469; U. S. 1:. Eighty-four Boxes Sugar, 7 Pet., 453; Lee 1·. Lec, 8 Pct., 44; Haganr. Folson, 10 Pct., 160; Minor v. Tillotson, 1 How., 287; Knap r. Bank, 2 How., 73; Mathes0n’s Administrator v. Grant’s Administrator, 2 How., 2gb); Barry ·v. Marconi, 5 How., 103; Mayberry 1-. Thompson, 5 How., 121; Bayard r. Lombard, 9 How., 530; Brooks v. Norris, 11 How., 201; Connor v. Pcu§lI1’s Lcsscc, 18 How., 394; Stevens 1-. Gladding, 19 How., 64; Dred Scott r. Sanford, 19 ow., 393; Doswell 1-. De La Lanza, 20 How., 29; Payne r. Niles, 20 How., 219; Suydam v. Williamson, 20 How., 427; Warner v. Norton, 20 How., 461; Roberts r. Cooper, 20 How., 467; McFaul v. Ramsay, 20 How., 527; Barton v. Forsyth, 20 How., 533; Holcomb v. McKusick, 20 How., 552; Mc(`arg01·. Cha · mun,20 How., 555; Rice 1·. Minnesota, &c·., Railroad, 21 How., 82; Richmond r. MH- waukce, 21 How., 391; U. S. at rel., v. Addison, 22 How., 174; Kellogg r. Forsyth, 24 How., 186; Hccker lv. Fowler, 1 Bl.,95; Pmttr. Fitzhugh, 1 Bl., 271; Ex purlctiordon, 1 Bl., 503; Taylor 1*. Morton, 2 Bl., 48l; Dc Krafft 1*. Bumey, 2 Bl., 704; P0lllfo\',B Lesseu u. Bank of Indiana, 1 Wall., 592; Ryan r. Billdlvy, I “'nll., 66; Burr r. Des`Mnines Railroad, &c,, 1 Wall., 99; Lee r. Watson, 1 Wall., 337; Gregg l-. Forsvth, 2 Wall.,56; Heckers 1·. Fowler, 2 Wall., 123; Cooke`:; L'. S., 2 Wall., 218; I\larine'Bank w. Fulton Bank, 2 Wall., 252; Harvey 1·. Tyler, 2 Wall., 328; Sparrow r. Strong, 3 Wall., 103; Silnpson v. Dall, 3 \Vall., 460, (473;) Rogers 1-. Burlington, 3 Wall., 654; l'. S. r. Dashiel, 3 \ all., 688; Walker 1-. U. S., 4 Wall., 163; Davidson 1·. Lanier, 4 Wall., 453; Sparrow 1-. Strong, 4 Wall., 584; U. S.1·. McMaste1—s, 4 Wall., 682; Barton z·. Forsyth, 5 Wall., 190; Thompson r. Riggs, 5 Wall., 663; McCllme w-. Boon, 6 Wall., 244; (`itv of Washington v. Dennison, 6 \Vall., 495; Evgnarle Me·Ardle, 7 Wall., 506; Washin ton County z·. Durant, 7 Wall., 694; Avcnduno r. way, 8 Wall., 376; Morris's Cotton, 8%\’all., 507; Steamboat Burns, 9 Wall., 237; New Orleans Railroad v. Morgan, 10 Wall., 256; luastersou 1-. Herndon, 10 Wall., 416; Miller l·. U. S., ll Wall., 268; Cook r. Burnley, ll Wall., 672; Germain v. Mason, 12 Wall., 259; Knox zu Exchange Bank, 12 Wall., 379; Hampton v. Rouse, 13 Wall., 187; lusurance Company 1-. Barton, 13 Wall., 603; 0'Dowd 1-. Russell, 14 Wall., 402; Merrill r. Petty, 16 Wall., 344 ; Moore •·. Robbins, 18 Wall., 588; St. (`lair County v. Lovingston, 18 Wall., 628; Kitchen v. Randolph, 93 U. 8.,86; Yznaga Del gglle UYHIYHBOD 2;% U. S., 233; Wlswall et u1.v.0¤mpbell ct al., 9:; U, s,, 347; .S.v. oung, 94 . ., .
