2 " (c) What interests on each side of the boundary would be benefited? What would be the nature and extent of such benefit in each case? How should the cost be apportioned among the various interests so benefited? " Question 3. What methods of control and o eration would be feasible and advisable in order to regulate the volume, use and outflow of the waters in each case in accordance with such recommendations as may be made in answer to questions one and two? · " Question 4. What interests on each side of the boundary are benefited by the present storage on Rainy Lake and on the waters controlled by the dams at Kettle falls? VVhat are the nature and extent of such benefits in each case? iVhat is the cost of such storage and how should such cost be appor- tioned among the various interests so benefited? " Each Government will appoint from its public service such engineering] and other technical assistance as may be neces- sary to ena le the Commission to make the desired examination and to submit their report." IN Wrrrmss Wummor the undersigned have signed this Agreement at Washington this 24th day of February, 1925. CHARLES Evans Htromzs Secretary ag State of the United tatea of America Em~ms·r Laroirvm · Minister of Justice in the Government of the Dominion of Canada O
�
