| FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2) Valu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC2G 95 | |
| File number(s): | SYG 1768 of 2020 |
| Judgment of: | JUDGE SKAROS |
| Date of judgment: | 31 January 2025 |
| Catchwords: | MIGRATION – Legal Practitioners– conduct of legal practitioner before the Court - citation of cases and quotes from Tribunal decision which do not exist – case citations generated by an artificial intelligence program – practitioner afforded an opportunity make submissions as to why he should not be referred to the Office of the NSW Legal Services Commissioner – Referral made |
| Legislation: | Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) 2014 ss 296, 297, 298
Legal Profession Uniform Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW) r 19.1, 22.5, |
| Cases cited: | Dayal [2024] FedCFamC2F 1166
Mata v Avianca Inc, 678 F Supp 3d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) |
| Division: | Division 2 General Federal Law |
| Number of paragraphs: | 38 |
| Date of hearing: | 10 December 2024 |
| Place | Parramatta |
| Solicitor for the Applicant | The applicant was represented by a solicitor whose name has been anonymised. The applicant's solicitor was represented by Mr George. |
| Counsel for the First Respondent: | Mr Reilly |
| Solicitor for the First Respondent: | Minter Ellison |
Page:Valu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) (2025, FedCFamC2G).pdf/1
Appearance