go with it. We will never have true freedom
until we abolish the system of agriculture which
existed in the Southern States. It is useless to
have any schools while we maintain the stronghold of slavery as the agricultural system of the
country.”[1] This question kept coming up in the
South Carolina convention and elsewhere.
Such arguments led in South Carolina to a scheme to
buy land and distribute it and some $800,000 was
appropriated for this purpose.
In the second place, property was attacked through the tax system. The South had been terribly impoverished and was saddled with new social burdens. Many of the things which had been done well or indifferently by the plantations —like the punishment of crime and the care of the sick and the insane, and such schooling as there was, with most other matters of social uplift were, after the war, transferred to the control of the state. Moreover the few and comparatively indifferent public buildings of slavery days had been ruined either by actual warfare or by neglect. Thus a new and tremendous burden of social taxation was put upon the reconstructed states.
As a southern writer says of the state of Mississippi: “The work of restoration which the government was obliged to undertake, made in
- ↑ Fleming, Vol. I, pp. 450-1.
