Page:Young India.pdf/96

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
68
YOUNG INDIA

organised social system, a conception of government based on law and on the legal rights of subjects inter se, as well as against the ruling monarch.[1]

We have, besides, ample evidences in the ancient literature of India, as translated and interpreted by Western scholars, to the effect that democratic institutions were not unknown to Ancient India.[2] Nor can it be said that the idea of universal sovereignty over the whole of India under one permanent power was unknown to the Hindus. How often it was realised and for how long, can not be said with any certainty.[3]

First Invasion of India. The first political and military invasion of India known to history was that of Alexander the Great in 326 b. c. Alexander was no doubt victorious up to a certain point, but he never conquered India, nor did he occupy it. He did not reach even so far into the interior as Delhi on the Jumna. He is said to have left behind him some officers to administer the affairs of the conquered province, but it is a well established historical fact that in the conflict between Chandra Gupta, the Hindu, and Seleucus, the Greek, who was the chief ruling authority in Babylon after the death of Alexander, Seleucus was practically worsted and a peace was concluded by which the independence of India was fully realised. Chandra Gupta ruled over the whole of India north of

  1. The Raja (i. e., the king) was not above the law.” See Wilson’s note on p. 203, vol. 1 of Mill’s British India.
  2. See Rhys David’s “ Buddhist India.”
  3. See an account of Yudhishthira’s Rajsuya yajna in the Mahabharata.