Smith v. California (375 U.S. 259)/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
923665Smith v. California (375 U.S. 259) — Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

375 U.S. 259

Smith  v.  California


Edward de Grazia, for Allen and others, as amici curiae.

Thomas M. Thomas, for American Library Association, as amici curiae.

Nathan L. Schoichet, A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand, for American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, as amici curiae.

Charles H. Keating, Jr., for respondent Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., and others, as amici curiae.

Certiorari to the Appellate Department, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for further consideration in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of California in Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal.2d 901, 31 Cal.Rptr. 800, 383 P.2d 152.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse