Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • 2d 838 (1990) Paitsel v. Black 922 F.2d 838 (1990) Allen v. City of Garland, Texas 922 F.2d 838 (1990) Whitfield v. Dorich 922 F.2d 838 (1990) Malone v
    74 KB (6,241 words) - 23:20, 16 April 2012
  • Inc v. Traillour Oil Company 987 F.2d 1160 (1993) Waggoner v. City of Garland Texas 987 F.2d 1167 (1993) Timely Secretarial Service Inc General Electric
    48 KB (4,103 words) - 23:00, 16 April 2012
  • 2d 211 (1987) Wood v. Armco Inc 814 F.2d 216 (1987) News-Texan Inc v. City of Garland Texas 814 F.2d 221 (1987) No 86-2671 Summary Calendar 814 F.2d 223
    46 KB (4,172 words) - 23:37, 16 April 2012
  • 864 F.2d 394 (1989) Gassner v. City of Garland Texas Ml 864 F.2d 401 (1989) Hinojosa v. City of Terrell Texas 864 F.2d 402 (1989) Jolley v. Paine Webber
    53 KB (4,592 words) - 23:28, 16 April 2012
  • buyers lived in over fifty widely separated communities scattered from Garland, Texas, to Nashua, New Hampshire and Visalia, California. The lowest salary
    16 KB (2,448 words) - 16:20, 1 July 2011
  • 1485 (1989) Franks v. Harwell 869 F.2d 1485 (1989) Whitaker v. City of Garland, Texas 869 F.2d 1485 (1989) Clements v. Foti 869 F.2d 1485 (1989) Prince v
    100 KB (8,335 words) - 23:29, 16 April 2012
  • (1995) United States v. Loggins 66 F.3d 322 (1995) Hittle v. City of Garland Texas 66 F.3d 322 (1995) United States v. Eicke 66 F.3d 322 (1995) United
    146 KB (12,343 words) - 22:38, 16 April 2012
  • Te-Ta-Ma Truth Foundation-Family of Uri Inc 537 U.S. 1111 (2003) City of Garland Texas v. Larson 537 U.S. 1111 (2003) Armada Oil Gas Company v. Pdv Midwest
    722 KB (58,175 words) - 14:14, 25 April 2013
  •  v.  TEXAS [Statement of Case from pages 621-624 intentionally omitted] A. H. Garland, H. J. May, and C. A. Culberson, for the State of Texas. [Argument
    2 KB (117 words) - 16:37, 21 June 2011
  • United States v. Texas (162 U.S. 1) by John Marshall Harlan Syllabus 822981United States v. Texas (162 U.S. 1) — SyllabusJohn Marshall Harlan
    2 KB (120 words) - 16:38, 21 June 2011
  • S. 617 TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY  v.  BARRETT John F. Dillon, W. S. Pierce, and D. D. Duncan, for plaintiff. A. H. Garland and R. C. Garland, for defendant
    2 KB (97 words) - 05:10, 11 October 2011
  • States Supreme Court 163 U.S. 353 TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY  v.  GENTRY John F. Dillon, for plaintiff in error. R. C. Garland, for defendants in error. Mr
    2 KB (91 words) - 10:34, 21 June 2011
  • States Supreme Court 111 U.S. 486 TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY  v.  KIRK W. Hallett Phillips and A. H. Garland, for motion. John F. Dillon, Wager
    2 KB (95 words) - 10:32, 21 June 2011
  • States Supreme Court 111 U.S. 488 TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY  v.  MURPHY W. Hallett Phillips and A. H. Garland, for motion. W. D. Davidge, in opposition
    1 KB (86 words) - 00:05, 14 September 2011
  • Kansas. TEXAS & PAC. RY. CO. v. McALLISTER. No. 610. SAME v. KIRK. No. 797. SAME v. MURPHY. No. 824. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Texas. May
    2 KB (262 words) - 05:15, 14 May 2011
  • Curriden v. Middleton 232 U.S. 637 (1914) Holt v. Henley 232 U.S. 642 (1914) Garland v. Washington 232 U.S. 647 (1914) Grant Brothers Construction Company v
    10 KB (821 words) - 00:56, 8 May 2011
  • Texas & P. Railway Company v. Marshall (136 U.S. 393) by Samuel Freeman Miller Syllabus 806866Texas & P. Railway Company v. Marshall (136 U.S. 393)
    10 KB (1,486 words) - 10:29, 21 June 2011
  •  v.  STATE OF TEXAS J. S. Hogg Atty. Gen., and R. H. Harrison, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the state. J. Randolph Burns and A. H. Garland, opposed. The
    3 KB (392 words) - 04:17, 18 August 2011
  • The Strathairly 124 U.S. 581 (1888) Great Falls Manufacturing Company v. Garland 124 U.S. 601 (1888) Munson v. City of New York 124 U.S. 605 (1888) Phillips
    10 KB (786 words) - 02:59, 17 April 2011
  • David D. Duncan, for plaintiff in error. James G. Dudley, A. H. Garland, and R. C. Garland, for defendant in error. Mr. Justice SHIRAS, after stating the
    5 KB (784 words) - 15:20, 19 June 2011

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)