Talk:Nash v Inman
User:ShakespeareFan00, I think I might have got the copyright wrong, since as you said it is not a government publication. Would you please be able to fix this? I've tried, and I'm a little confused. —unsigned comment by Orthogonal1 (talk) .
Source information[edit]
This work was copied by hand from a book in a law library. I have not been able to obtain photocopies, but most law libraries should have a copy. The reference [1908] 2 KB 1 should be all you need to find it, but if it helps, I have copied the title page of the book and put it below here (with formatting slightly changed for usefulness).
1908.
THE LAW REPORTS OF THE INCORPORATED COUNCIL OF LAW REPORTING. KING'S BENCH DIVISION AND ON APPEAL THEREFROM IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, DECISIONS IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL AND DECISIONS OF THE RAILWAY AND CANAL COMMISSION.
EDITOR - SIR FREDERICK POLLOCK, BART., Barrister-at-Law.
ASSISTANT EDITOR - A. P. STONE, Barrister-at-Law.
REPORTERS
Court of Appeal: EDMUND LUMLEY, W. J. BROOKS, Barristers-at-Law.
King's Bench, Court of Criminal Appeal; Appeals from County Courts in Bankruptcy Cases, and Railway and Canal Commission Cases: J. F. CLERK, A. P. P. KEEP, F. O. ROBINSON, J. E. ALDOUS, W. H. GRIFFITH, W. F. BARRY, Barristers-at-Law.
Bankruptcy Cases: H. L. FRASER, Barrister-at-Law.
1908.-VOL. II.
LONDON:
Printed for the Council of Law Reporting
BY BRADBURY, AGNEW, & CO. LD., OF 10, BOUVERIE STREET, E.C.,
And Published
BY THE COUNCIL AT 10, OLD SQUARE, LINCOLN'S INN, W.C.
—unsigned comment by Orthogonal1 (talk) .