United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc. (380 U.S. 931)/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

United States Supreme Court

380 U.S. 931

United Gas Improvement Company  v.  Callery Properties, Inc.


Solicitor General Cox, Frank Goodman, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Josephine H. Klein for the Federal Power Commission, petitioner in No. 756.

Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Josephine H. Klein, for the Federal Power Commission, respondent in No. 714.

Richard F. Generelly, for Callery Properties, Inc.

Robert W. Henderson, Thomas G. Crouch and Paul W. Hicks, for Sands and others.

Herbert W. Verner, Murray Christian and Roland B. Voight, for Superior Oil Co.

Chauncey P. Williams, Jr., Edward S. Kirby, James R. Lacey, Edwin F. Russell, Harry G. Hill, Jr., and Barbara M. Suchow, for Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. and others, as amici curiae.

March 8, 1965.

The motion of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Incorporated, et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, in No. 671, is granted. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted. Cases consolidated and a total of four hours allotted for oral argument.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse