User talk:Herr Beethoven

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Hello, Herr Beethoven, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Carl Spitzweg 021-detail.jpg

You may be interested in participating in

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{CotW}} to your page for current wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! Billinghurst (talk) 13:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I reverted our edit as it does not align with the cited text. Happy for you to provide evidence on why we should work with your preferred edit. Billinghurst (talk) 13:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh, Sorry! I never thought about the original source. I just did that because "brother" does not make sense in that context, nor is it in the original German text. Herr Beethoven (talk) 03:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
What a great catch! I would think that it would be worth an annotation to that effect then. Either put a comment into the notes, or you can use <ref group=annotation>{{user annotation|Original text states:"… …" which would translate as "… …"}}</ref>. We would also need to stick an appropriate heading at the base and something like <references group="annotation" /> at the base of the document. If you need a hand, let me know. Again, great job. Billinghurst (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Nibelungenlied/Adventure I: Is this what you mean? Herr Beethoven (talk) 16:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Your second correction made me very suspicious of our source, so I checked against an image of the publication, and these would seem to be errors in transcription effort. As they are sense-making corrections, I have pretty much gone back to your first position and just corrected the text and referenced the page that I used for that correction. Can I say that this is why our preference is for our new methodology of proofreading and validating against the images themselves. Thanks for the corrections, and an apology if it seems as if I was mucking you around. Billinghurst (talk) 22:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)