Weeks v. United States (232 U.S. 383)
|Fremont Weeks v. United States by
|United States Supreme Court unanimously held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment. It also set forth the exclusionary rule that prohibits admission of illegally obtained evidence in federal courts. — Excerpted from Weeks v. United States on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.In Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), the|
United States Supreme Court
FREMONT WEEKS v. UNITED STATES
No. 461. Argued: and submitted December 2 and 3, 1913. --- Decided: February 24, 1914.
Mr. Martin J. O'Donnell for plaintiff in error.
- [Argument of Counsel from page 384 intentionally omitted]
Assistant Attorney General Denison and Solicitor General Davis for defendant in error.
- [Argument of Counsel from page 385 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:
|This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).|